Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer: Panthers WR’s possibilities for Chiefs

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ricky Prickles Veteran

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Not a 4th but a 2nd or 3rd is better than nothing. 

I agree better than nothing but I almost feel like it could be worth taking the chance to see if he would be interested in long term here. They need to feel him out and see how he feels about the long term. If he is in it for the long-term here I would hang onto him but if he says he probably is not I would consider moving him. Hopefully everyone is honest with one another 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Y’all fall in love too quickly. I’d like to date a bit longer before buying a ring. No trade yet. Get him 2-3 more games, 300 more yards, 2+ more TDs and let the contenders in need get a bit more desperate.  Big contracts to damaged goods 1 year rentals… fraught with peril. 

Defense needs help. No more big $ on offense, please. 

It's okay to discuss it now, not like it will progress to signing in a week or two from here. 

As far as his price on an expiring contract, having the inside track to a potent WR, if you think you are about to do something, that is a feature.

It is an edge for your team, if you decide he fits (and also depending on the other UFA WRs which I haven't looked up). But it adds an incentive in the right market. 

We can also bluff that we are getting a comp pick either way so why would we sell close to that...

You don't HAVE to trade him, but you can give people the opportunity to get some bidding fever going. 

As far as drafting we need to remember both our the top offensive coaches came up working with receivers. I think they probably have a good eye for evaluation relative to the fit they want.

I don't think we need to tie our past WR flubs to these guys. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Prickles Veteran

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

https://x.com/adamschefter/status/1841216505825857679?s=46&t=W75E23VenL1ei42iX22E5g
 

Raiders are hoping to get a 2nd for Adams and we have people thinking we’d get a 1 or 2 for Johnson LOL

I'm not thinking we would get a 1 for him, I'm just saying I wouldn't trade him for less than that and would hang onto him. I would prefer not trade him at all and see about keeping him long term

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I'm not thinking we would get a 1 for him, I'm just saying I wouldn't trade him for less than that and would hang onto him. I would prefer not trade him at all and see about keeping him long term

If he is not going to sign then he is not going to sign and you have to deal him for whatever you can get.  That would be very panthery to simply let him walk without any draft capital

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gapanthersfan Experienced

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, strato said:

It's okay to discuss it now, not like it will progress to signing in a week or two from here. 

As far as his price on an expiring contract, having the inside track to a potent WR, if you think you are about to do something, that is a feature.

It is an edge for your team, if you decide he fits (and also depending on the other UFA WRs which I haven't looked up). But it adds an incentive in the right market. 

We can also bluff that we are getting a comp pick either way so why would we sell close to that...

You don't HAVE to trade him, but you can give people the opportunity to get some bidding fever going. 

As far as drafting we need to remember both our the top offensive coaches came up working with receivers. I think they probably have a good eye for evaluation relative to the fit they want.

I don't think we need to tie our past WR flubs to these guys. 

It’s a tough call. I love the guy’s game and it’s really difficult to find a player who can do what he does…. But it’s almost like ptsd. We have a history of getting roasted with overpaying 1 year wonders and it ends up setting us back. 

On the flip side, we have the chance to have 3 really, really good receivers for the first time since…. 2003…  Dude goes across the middle and is not shy of contact. His YAC is impressive. 

priority numero uno of the offseason is locking Andy up for at least 2-3 years. Critical for developing Mingo and XL. I really want Thielen back. Is there room for Johnson to stay with what he’ll demand? 

Either way, I’m really enjoying the ride and do trust Morgan. I’m being patient with his additions. Thus far, not a peep from Tep which is refreshing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gapanthersfan
      As fans have we unanimously concluded that Bryce Young IS THE PROBLEM

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      If my reply comes off argumentative, that is not my intention so please don’t take it as such.  You said one word, probably subconsciously, in your post that immediately disqualifies him from being a QB in the NFL. You actually said it twice. Kid. It’s exactly how you see him, and exactly how the rest of the entire NFL sees him as well.  Yes, he is a kid, he looks and acts like a kid and that exactly IS the problem. The NFL is for grown ass men. Period. Hell, our kicker looks like he collects ‘taxes’ as a side hustle. These are straight dudes. Men.  Nothing in his persona changed from last year to this.  Nothing in his physical stature. Nothing. He has shown 0 development. 0. And he disrespects the entire organization, talking video games and Netflix in the offseason. Bro. Really. My man Chuba is busting his ass to look good for his second contract. Set himself up for life. How many RBs make it to even sign contract #3? First 2 games he has to run in to a brick wall continuously because Netflix can’t even get it over the LOS.  He’s a kid who pulled off the biggest heist in world history. He looks happier on the sideline goofing around than he ever has looked on the field. It’s time to cut bait. 
    • beo
      2024 College Football Thread

      By beo · Posted

      I hear you and I can imagine it's frustrating as a fan, but UNC-CH leaving the ACC would be throwing away over a century of history. It would really suck if y'all, or Clemson, or any of the other remaining charter members leave. I still think it sucks that Maryland left as well. Feels so wrong not having that rivalry anymore. Maryland fuging hated us and I loved it. Who's Maryland's rival now in the big 10? Rutgers? lol. Also, I think that the Heels are more likely to be Kentucky 2.0 than you are to get serious about football upon joining the SEC. Both UNC (and also Duke's) administrations seem very stuck in their ways with sticking to their ways and remaining basketball powerhouses. I do wish we could see NC teams actually competing in my favorite sport sometimes but alas. I personally value keeping our history intact over trying to become top flight CFB programs because nowadays it's just a pay to win sport anyways. Even if UNC-CH got serious I doubt they could compete with that Texas oil money, or that Oregon nike money, or that USC rich kid money. That's all top level college football really is anymore. You're either an established blue blood or you're willing to waste tons of money that could be spent on education rather than football. 
    • CamWhoaaCam
      2024 College Football Thread

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Maybe a move to the SEC forces UNC to be more serious about football?   I mean we should be making noise in the weak ACC and we can't even do that. How is Duke better than UNC in football right now? It's honestly sad and pathetic.   It doesn't matter if we get another great QB as you said a QB doesn't mean you have a great roster. A QB can only do so much. We lack elite guys in the trenches. That's how you build a program. It starts up front.
×
×
  • Create New...