Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those touting Beck


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's Will Levis on a better team.

So yeah, in the early 2nd I'd start to get tempted depending on who else was available.

It’s time for us the be the patient team and let a QB fall to us. Don’t touch one with our first but if one we like falls to us later take him and let the poor bastard sit behind a vet for fugs sake 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

It’s time for us the be the patient team and let a QB fall to us. Don’t touch one with our first but if one we like falls to us later take him and let the poor bastard sit behind a vet for fugs sake 

We've made too many dumb decisions to trust ourselves. Trading up was honestly probably the right call. We just drafted the wrong QB. No reason to think we wouldn't do it again. I'm fine with taking a QB in the first but don't trade up to do it. I don't trust the organization to make the right call.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've made too many dumb decisions to trust ourselves. Trading up was honestly probably the right call. We just drafted the wrong QB. No reason to think we wouldn't do it again. I'm fine with taking a QB in the first but don't trade up to do it. I don't trust the organization to make the right call.

Strangely I do trust Canales but I can’t see him getting the final say 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kid has the arm and can make all the NFL throws. 

Like Kevin O’Connell said it’s on organizations to develop these kids. I see the Levis comp above and that’s fair without the extremely boneheaded crap Levis has been doing these first few weeks. If that’s the case pair Beck up with a good coach and he’d be fine 

People are really starting to mistake college success equals success as a pro

Its how a Bryce Young ends up going 1

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 int's and couldn't finish the comeback.

 

Sanders/Ward both finished the job during their comebacks.

 

Im not a Beck fan but he's gonna mess around and be available in the later rounds and I think Canales may take him as his project QB. That's my worst nightmare because I want nothing to do with this kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

3 int's and couldn't finish the comeback.

 

Sanders/Ward both finished the job during their comebacks.

 

Im not a Beck fan but he's gonna mess around and be available in the later rounds and I think Canales may take him as his project QB. That's my worst nightmare because I want nothing to do with this kid.

Not a Beck fan either but it's kinda crazy to compare coming back agaist Baylor to Alabama.... 

Ward is my favorite but VT is also no where close to Alabama. 

 

#Ward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...