Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper finally bringing a GOAT to BOA


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

This Metallica tour is 'no repeat' across 2 nights, meaning there will be a show Friday night and another Sunday night, each with different openers and with Metallica playing entirely different sets each night. We went to the show in St. Louis last year and it was a good time. 

That said, Tepper sucks. 

Carpool Karaoke Metallica GIF by Carpool Karaoke: The Series on Apple Music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, KSpan said:

This Metallica tour is 'no repeat' across 2 nights, meaning there will be a show Friday night and another Sunday night, each with different openers and with Metallica playing entirely different sets each night. We went to the show in St. Louis last year and it was a good time. 

That said, Tepper sucks. 

Carpool Karaoke Metallica GIF by Carpool Karaoke: The Series on Apple Music

the email I got from the panthers stated one night

they did the two night thing last year in Dallas, which was shown in some movie theatres live, we went to a theatre in Asheville that was showing it, it was the first time I'd watched a concert like that, the camera angles were cool, something I'd do again

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Candler Cat said:

the email I got from the panthers stated one night

they did the two night thing last year in Dallas, which was shown in some movie theatres live, we went to a theatre in Asheville that was showing it, it was the first time I'd watched a concert like that, the camera angles were cool, something I'd do again

Ah, sure enough. Maybe they're done with the 2-night thing. I'm too lazy to look it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...