Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heres some good in the ocean of awful....

Basbear

By Basbear,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

RevJ Community Regular

RevJ

Posted
Posted

Brian Burns is still hovering at a 70 PFF grade and has no sacks (although I would suspect he has sprinted past the QB many times).  

Not implying he's trash, just looks like the right move to decide to spend the $ elsewhere.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

with how much offenses around the league are relying on the run this year Brooks may end up being one of the steals of the draft

trading for the rams second rounder looks like a stroke of genius at the moment

otherwise agree with everything you said 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Morgan Grand Master

Captain Morgan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, t96 said:

Yeah exactly, considering how many great players we've sold off in recent years rather than pay and with a QB on rookie contract we should be one of the few teams with $100M+ cap space.

 

42.7 mill in 2025, 

153 mill in 2026 (7th most)

231 mill in 2027 (10th most)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

42.7 mill in 2025, 

153 mill in 2026 (7th most)

231 mill in 2027 (10th most)

 

Yeah it gets better, still with our lack of talent those 2 years should be top 3 not 7/10. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, RevJ said:

Brian Burns is still hovering at a 70 PFF grade and has no sacks (although I would suspect he has sprinted past the QB many times).  

Not implying he's trash, just looks like the right move to decide to spend the $ elsewhere.  

The Giants entire strategy is overpaying average to good players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Veteran

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted
On 9/18/2024 at 9:09 PM, Jmac said:

If the red rifle can do the job and move the ball and keep the offense on the field, the defense may do a much better job. 

When you're constantly going 3 out it's impossible for the D to rest. We need to win time of possession for this team to be successful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...