Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is Sheena Hinting At?


App Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I like Sheena but trying to drag LeBron into this just sounds like she's chasing social media clout.

He only knows what he knows about the Panthers because someone from his team mentioned a name he's heard before. Bryce Young.

But what does it matter? Leaning on athletes from other sports for knowledge isn't going to fix this mess.

Establish a culture where losing is not accepted as another day at the office and go from there. In that regard benching Bryce Young was the first step in the right direction. That's the ugly truth.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Steph would be my guess.

Does seem vague. Wonder if there is some behind the scenes talk of selling the team. 

 

I'd believe it when I see it. 

She said it wasn’t Steph. She called them a scorer, so to me that takes MJ out (thank God) bc he’s the best player ever not just strictly a scorer. I saw a comment say Allen Iverson possibly lives in Charlotte, to me, that is one of the greatest scorers, so that’s my guess. 
 

why she brings this up, I have no clue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

I like Sheena but trying to drag LeBron into this just sounds like she's chasing social media clout.

He only knows what he knows about the Panthers because someone from his team mentioned a name he's heard before. Bryce Young.

But what does it matter? Leaning on athletes from other sports for knowledge isn't going to fix this mess.

Establish a culture where losing is not accepted as another day at the office and go from there. In that regard benching Bryce Young was the first step in the right direction. That's the ugly truth.

I like you Frank, but please no Sheena slander. She's my only hope for the Panthers right now. By far the best reporter in Panthers history!

 

#InSheenaWeTrust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I like you Frank, but please no Sheena slander. She's my only hope for the Panthers right now. By far the best reporter in Panthers history!

 

#InSheenaWeTrust

I've got no issue with Sheena. I just call it like I see it because Twitter (X) is one big grifters paradise.

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...