Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pacheco to IR, chance to load assets

MichaelNewtonII

By MichaelNewtonII,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MichaelNewtonII Contributor

MichaelNewtonII

Posted
Posted

https://x.com/adamschefter/status/1835674961232425093?s=46
 

chiefs star RB Isiah Pacheco went down last night win an injury and is expected to hit IR which means Kansas City should be in the market for a running back. I think this is the perfect time for Carolina to get in the mix to acquire some assets and trade them miles sanders. What do you all think of this idea and what price do you think miles would bring in from a team who is sure to be desperate for a decent runner at this point having only Perine and Carson Steele left

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MichaelNewtonII Contributor

MichaelNewtonII

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Miles Sanders isn't a good RB.  He is a one dimensional RB who once played on a good team/behind a great OL 

Is that not what Kansas City has? Lol they’ve already seen he can thrive on a top team. Not to mention teams play KC 2 high safeties the entire game begging them to run the ball 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Chuba is the obvious choice 

last year of his contract, probably won’t be in the plans moving forward, brooks is coming off IR at some point. 

let him go to a real team and prove me right. 

Exactly.  Other than Chuba, nobody is trading anything to get a bottom of the barrel back on a bloated contract.  You can find a guy in free agency that’s just as good if not better than Miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...