Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers waive tight end Feleipie Franks

Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

PFF is pffffffffftt, but didnt franks have 80 PFF grade?

The little I member, he looked "ok", which was better than 95% of the team. 

I thought Thomas at first and then remembered he was IRed. Must be Hubbard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Waldo said:

I thought Thomas at first and then remembered he was IRed. Must be Hubbard?

He did- https://sports.yahoo.com/best-worst-pff-grades-panthers-153538094.html

 

Quote

1. TE Feleipe Franks: 80.0

 

odd, he must have screwed up the biltz pick up or something on ST. 

It was franks, XL, and Mike Johnson(new) I thought played "ok" enough. everyone else(i maybe missed some OLmen) was TRASH!! Mike was new and a couple bad plays, but they tried picking on him and for most of it he held up

Shaq had 2 TFL, but arm tacks broken and missed gaps...he looked rusty at times- WHICH IS WHY YOU NEED TO PLAY PLAYERS IN THE PS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)

It maybe has something to do with the guy they claimed. Or signed last week. 

Also could be... any unsigned decent vet TEs because the deals are not guaranteed if they aren't on the roster week 1. 

Or I guess waiver claim period starts some time after MNF is over and this may be in advance of something they are planning.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...