Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How surpised were you at how the team looked(Game 1 Edition)?


kungfoodude
 Share

How surprised were you at how the team looked(Game 1 Edition)?  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. 0 = Not Surprised at all, 5 = Absolutely shocked



Recommended Posts

How can we be shocked? Literally every other team actually played starters at in the preseason and we hid Bryce.

Not asking to play them the whole preseason, but it is coaching malpractice to not give the guys reps since communications killed them all day yesterday.

I said if before and I'll say it again, Bryce Young is not an NFL caliber QB and we sold the farm for him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 - I knew it was going to be bad but not that bad. The team is weak and got bullied. Morgan looks like a clown and DC like a guy who has never coached in the NFL before.

They took a jab to the face on all 3 phases of the game and got ragdolled after that. That dawg has no fight in it lol

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very surprised. I guess I'm just an idiot but I actually believed with some protection and an off-season of preparation that Bryce may be able to achieve average QB in the league. I didn't expect the world and all I had hoped for was just an average starter with lots of help around him. Needles to say I was shocked and down and now feel like an idiot 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

The scheme and the offensive line looked better. But it's clear the team just doesn't believe in Bryce. The defense especially. They saw that first pick and said, "yeah I'm not doing this poo again."

Can't say I blame them after being left on the field every game last year too. The next 2-3 games (3 if he gets another) are going to be crucial for Bryce to show something or he's done.

I recognize the fan in you doesn't want Young to be a failure. Quit extending him another 2 or 3 games to show something. He hasn't shown anything in a season+. Nothing, nada, nul, nunca. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I expected bad. But I also expected the Saints to be bad. I thought it was going to be some 16-12 or 19-14 type struggle. However, in the words of Rivera " We picked a bad day to have a bad day."

John Fox said that after the 2008 playoff melt vs Zona.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shocked we looked as bad as we did.  I thought were going to lose, but damn, that was rough.  If I remember correctly, I was thinking about 6 wins this year, which is still a bad team.  I thought we would look slightly better than last year.  Based off yesterday, boy was I wrong!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They looked exactly like I expected. 

2023's worst team with a rookie coaching staff, a Bryce Young QB'd offense, an overachieving defense stripped of talent starting guys that were cut by other teams two weeks ago, a team that hadn't played any real simulated football together outside one series against another team's second string that was opening on the road against a divisional rival in one the harshest environments in the NFL.

Anyone that expected anything different was just deluding themselves.  It was only a matter of how badly we'd lose.

Edited by Newtcase
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, strato said:

I went with '3'.

After watching Young last year, you had to be aware that that performance could happen. 

He hasn't proven much in the way of good, but there was hope for seeing some of the near field point guard throws be at least somewhat effective. 

Was very surprised to see that slack run defense.  I knew there were issues elsewhere. 

The run defense and run offense was shockingly bad. The rushing offense may have been the biggest disappointment overall.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected us to be pretty bad, but this was somehow even worse. This season will be all about the o-line growing together, develop young talent on both sides of the ball etc. Then we can be ready for a new QB in the draft. I think this will end up being a very strong group of QBs, so I’m excited about it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I was shocked at how bad they were. The most shocking things was that they played with no heart at all. They got pushed around and made fun of repeatedly and didn't do a single thing about it. 

We were getting out-physicaled all day long. 

Hopefully it's just a product of rust and lack of cohesion due to trying to develop chemistry. I have my doubts though that time will help, especially with a QB playing as bad as Bryce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we would lean on the run a lot more and slowly add Bryce with some PA throws.  Looks like a team that has not bought in.

I don't think Bryce is completely broken yet but whatever newfound confidence he'd started to build went down the drain with that first pick. 

I expect them to look a little better next week but won't "figure it out" until Jonathon Brooks becomes the starter in 5 or 6 games.  We'll have won maybe 1 game by them and realize our only option is to pound the rock.  We will start doing that.  Brooks will break out as a star.  Bryce will improve little by little and start to look like his college tape or he actually is a complete bust and around week 10 Canales realizes we have a stud oline and RB and he'll bench Bryce.  We'll stupidly then win just enough games to kill a high enough draft pick to replace Bryce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...