Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

A shame the brand is keeping Bama in. Any objective person watching college football can see that South Carolina is a better football team than Bama, who has played bad the last 6 weeks.

I think they are the same tier teams.  I think most of the top 25 really is.  I’d probably let head to head settle the differences.  That OU loss would make me think long and hard though.  With no dog in that fight, I could understand it either way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack. That doesn't make a damn bit of sense that they'd fire you kete days before you were going to retire.

I read this comment from Bubba:

We've had some inconsistencies," Cunningham said. "We had a lot of ambiguity about what our future looked like, and we needed clarity. This year in particular, we were up and down. We had all the things – the James Madison postgame thing — and i was really hopeful that he and I could agree what the future would be and when we would make that decision and go forward. But ultimately, we couldn't."

Cunningham said the pair have been having conversations about future and about "clarity" since the James Madison game.

The administration offered Brown, the winningest coach in program history, the chance to retire, sources said. Brown said during a press conference Monday that his intention was to coach the Tar Heels in 2025.

"I said that we're going to have a different coach next year, and we couldn't agree about how," Cunningham said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, for Mack to pretend like he got the rug jerked out from under him mere days before he was planning to announce his retirement really soils his legacy IMO. It's a lie and it's not even a believable lie. You'd literally been saying in the days leading up to it that you planned to return next year and why would they fire you if you were planning to retire? It just doesn't add up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I think they are the same tier teams.  I think most of the top 25 really is.  I’d probably let head to head settle the differences.  That OU loss would make me think long and hard though.  With no dog in that fight, I could understand it either way 

Head to head is a poor argument given the trajectory of both teams. If you eliminate FSU last year because they lost their QB. 

 

Why not reward the team who's Freshman QB has caught fire since early in the season when that game was played. 

 

Also adding to the fact SC should only have 2 losses as they were robbed in that LSU game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Head to head is a poor argument given the trajectory of both teams. If you eliminate FSU last year because they lost their QB. 

Why not reward the team who's Freshman QB has caught fire since early in the season when that game was played. 

Also adding to the fact SC should only have 2 losses as they were robbed in that LSU game. 

well, every fanbase can argue if it wasn’t for the refs they would have won a game they lost.   But aside from that, I’m good either way.   SC or Bama.   I think that will be far down the list of complaints when the dust settles.  

frankly I’m rooting for chaos so the CFP has to really show their hands and set precedence year 1 of the 12 team format.   Or outrage is generated so they fix the format/criteria    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, every fanbase can argue if it wasn’t for the refs they would have won a game they lost.   But aside from that, I’m good either way.   SC or Bama.   I think that will be far down the list of complaints when the dust settles.  

frankly I’m rooting for chaos so the CFP has to really show their hands and set precedence year 1 of the 12 team format.   

 

Typically one can. But it was argued at a NATIONAL level that they got screwed and my biggest complaint about Beamer is his aw shucks attitude about everything. He should have gone piss and vinegar about it and ate that fine given he makes several mil per year. 

 

He had another opportunity in his post game presser and didn't take it. If he gets left out he will have only himself to blame. 

Edited by SCMunnerlyn1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Typically one can. But it was argued at a NATIONAL level that they got screwed and my biggest complaint about Beamer is his aw shucks attitude about everything. He should have gone piss and vinegar about it and ate that fine given he makes several mil per year. 

 

He had another opportunity in his post game presser and didn't take it. If he gets left out he will have only himself to blame. 

What I really wish happened in football in both college and pro….is after a game is over and the league/conference/refs “explain” what happened on a call…..that explanation was public info.   Because you know sometimes the response is….well, we got that one wrong. 

I’d love to hear the explanation on the Mafah fumble.   Clemson runs a play to the SC 20.  They then blow the whistle after that play to go back to review the play before that.    And they give SC the ball despite the fact that play was blown dead before SC “recovered” the ball.   I mean you don’t even have to get into the was he down with possession argument/fumble/lateral part.   No point arguing that component.  How do you rewind the clock like that after a full play is off AND then how do you award possession for what happened after a play was blown dead.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2024 at 2:24 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack. That doesn't make a damn bit of sense that they'd fire you kete days before you were going to retire.

egotistical boomer the worst of humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why Travis Hunter shouldn't win the Heisman? Because even Colorado isn't willing to actually sell that narrative. 

Colorado just sent their marketing to all Heisman voters for who should win....

it's HeisMEN.  Plural.  With Shueder listed first. 

Give my boy Jeanty the award. His numbers blow the last 2 Heisman RBs out of the water. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

why Travis Hunter shouldn't win the Heisman? Because even Colorado isn't willing to actually sell that narrative. 

Colorado just sent their marketing to all Heisman voters for who should win....

it's HeisMEN.  Plural.  With Shueder listed first. 

Give my boy Jeanty the award. His numbers blow the last 2 Heisman RBs out of the water. 

And when Travis doesn’t win….you can credit Deion for not helping in the end.  Deion controls all.  So that marketing pitch to all the Heisman voters was all Deion Sanders message.    And he prioritized his son….because that’s always been why he was in college football.  It’s family business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...