Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I'm not saying you leave them out, I'm just saying that teams with weak schedules should he punished. What encourages teams to play tough if a team with the 105th toughest schedule cruises in?

How do would you punish Indiana then? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Personally hope UNC doesn’t hire Mullen.  I read he was fired by Florida for player mistreatment and lack of effort on the recruiting trail.

Would rather have a younger candidate like Shumann or Sumrall.  

Arthur Smith would have been great but according to reports he isn't interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

You can set the expectation that any conference schedule that doesn't meet an sos limit loses consideration for the cfp going forward.

That unfairly punishes teams.  Which I get a SEC fan having little sympathy or understanding.  It’s a problem you are essentially uniquely immune to.  Final poll was Michigan 1 and Washington 2 last year.  Indiana had them both of them this year….they have no control of what they became. 

As a Clemson fan, every year when it was the final 4….everyone argued we didn’t belong because of SOS.  Underdogs in every game, ever played in the CFP.  2nd most wins though and 2nd most nattys.   I’m sure your model would have kept Clemson out almost every year.    No control of what Auburn, A&M, SC, ND, UGA, etc would or wouldn’t be. 

Old model never guaranteed entry.  New one should scrap it too.  It will be silly for Clemson and Iowa St to make it in….way more so than Indiana IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean regardless of what anyone argues, objectively Indiana does not belong in the top 12 and the committee should highlight that. Unfortunately that their schedule sucks, but then atleart make your conference championship game. They didn't even do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

McCord or Rourke could be two mid to later round QB prospects I’d be interested in. Could develop into high end backups with some starter traits. 

I like him as a mid-round in general (not specifically for us).  Although, we need depth at most spots and have a lot of picks.  Could be a 4th-5th rounder to take a stab at.  Never hurts rolling the dice with backups.

Sidebar - I will say, I am sufficiently confused to what these playoffs will bring.  I can't tell if there's just parody for once in college ball or if, as the draft class is hinting at, there's a pretty big void in talent right now.  I'm not impressed with so many of the offenses around the country this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack. That doesn't make a damn bit of sense that they'd fire you kete days before you were going to retire.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I mean regardless of what anyone argues, objectively Indiana does not belong in the top 12 and the committee should highlight that. Unfortunately that their schedule sucks, but then atleart make your conference championship game. They didn't even do that.

Well, coaches poll is out.  It was pretty in-sync with the CFP poll last week.  Think the top 12 was all the same outside of the Miami/UGA flip. 

Gamecocks 12.  Bama at 11.  

that puts Gamecocks as first out as of right now.   Lot of SEC fans pulling against Clemson and Iowa St this weekend.  They would knock Bama out too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mack Brown is starting to cry about how he was fired claiming he was going to retire all along but the school wanted it to be announced before the State game and he wanted to wait until after. Surely he doesn't think anyone believes that line of pure bullshit. The man had just been publicly talking about his plans to return next year. Seems pretty obvious they were trying to get him to retire and he refused then tried to pull a power move and talk about returning thinking they wouldn't be willing to fire him and he was wrong about that. Now he wants to play this victim bullshit. fug off Mack.

Some old people have trouble retiring. Mack doesn't seem like a guy who wants to play BINGO and sit and his rocking chair.

 

He genuinely loves coaching. It was time for him to go, but they could have waited until the season ended to announce it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, coaches poll is out.  It was pretty in-sync with the CFP poll last week.  Think the top 12 was all the same outside of the Miami/UGA flip. 

Gamecocks 12.  Bama at 11.  

that puts Gamecocks as first out as of right now.   Lot of SEC fans pulling against Clemson and Iowa St this weekend.  They would knock Bama out too

A shame the brand is keeping Bama in. Any objective person watching college football can see that South Carolina is a better football team than Bama, who has played bad the last 6 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Some old people have trouble retiring. Mack doesn't seem like a guy who wants to play BINGO and sit and his rocking chair.

 

He genuinely loves coaching. It was time for him to go, but they could have waited until the season ended to announce it.

I don't think they wanted to risk him beating State and then having to fire him after winning his primary rivalry game. Better to just rip the bandaid off after a disappointing loss on the road when we were utterly uncompetitive. If they had a crystal ball and knew for sure we'd lose to State I'm sure they would've waited.

It's whatever. It's Mack's fault regardless. He could've just retired. He had no plans to and he forced the university's hand so he needs to just shut up and quit whining about it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Some old people have trouble retiring. Mack doesn't seem like a guy who wants to play BINGO and sit and his rocking chair.

 

He genuinely loves coaching. It was time for him to go, but they could have waited until the season ended to announce it.

They did what they had to do. If he had not started to talk about returning next year they would have waited. Mack tried to pull a power play. Some very influential and high donors in the Rams Club were irate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...