Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

I think Cam and Sanders are going to have to sit and reprogram themselves.  Both have just gotten way too use of holding the ball and thinking they are good athletes behind the LOS.  That might work in the BIG12 and ACC but it’s the recipe to get murdered in the NFL.  

Both got the talent.  But talent ain’t enough.  see Caleb Williams. 

Yeah neither of them are playing NFL ball IMO (getting it out quick and stepping up in the pocket). They both have a lot of talent and with the right staff around them could be great. I just wouldn’t feel comfortable drafting either in the top 10. It’s a weak draft from top 10 talent in general…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m kind of glad Bryce played better later in this year. As much as I like Cam Ward, I wouldn’t want to pick a QB in the top 10 this year. Next year’s class should be much better. 

I'd be down for ward regardless. Yeah I agree there is better top end talent next year, but think the floor for ward is a starter. Idk if he's a top 5 guy for a decade, but he's gonna be a solid starter. Nothing in his college career says he can't be a mid level guy. From incarnate word, to Washington State to Miami, he just produced big time. Some huddlers were tapped in when he was still incarnate word, waiting for him to declare. Props to them, he looks the part every stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I totally agree and we might end up seeing players in the playoff going this route one day.  Maybe not but who knows.  If it was my kid and he was a possible top 20 pick no way in hell I want him to play.  Especially a non playoff bowl.  This is the rest of his life vs a meaningless game.

I think this era is going to produce business decision makers the likes we haven’t seen….and that means that will carry forward to the NFL.  I like my players like Cam Newton….trying to suit up after breaking his back the same week.   I didn’t want him to play then….but I liked they had to fight him not to play.   Dudes like Cam can carry and motivate a team beyond what they do on the field.  No NFL guys running through a brick wall for a lot of these new era guys IMO 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chbright said:

I'd be down for ward regardless. Yeah I agree there is better top end talent next year, but think the floor for ward is a starter. Idk if he's a top 5 guy for a decade, but he's gonna be a solid starter. Nothing in his college career says he can't be a mid level guy. From incarnate word, to Washington State to Miami, he just produced big time. Some huddlers were tapped in when he was still incarnate word, waiting for him to declare. Props to them, he looks the part every stop.

I like Ward and his whole journey is pretty impressive. With that said very few QB prospects have a FLOOR as a mid tier starter. He has played against ACC and PAC 12 defenses and sure he lit them up, but it’s a lot different in the NFL. Plus there is a good chance he goes to a team with a bad OL and that wants him to play ASAP. Both are recipes for hurting a young QB’s development. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is in for a rough season next year if they don't find a QB. I mean, they could see an FSU style fall off. Maybe not THAT bad but Cam Ward carried the fug out of that team.

We'll fire Guidry shortly (or let him find another job, as is Cristobal's way) and hire a new DC. There's a lot of talent on D, way more than those results would lead you to believe.

We need a QB in the Portal. We have a talented FR coming in, but Williams has just proven he isn't the guy next year. That's basically what we were looking at in the second half. Cristobal clearly didn't give two fugs about winning the game.

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is in for a rough season next year if they don't find a QB. I mean, they could see an FSU style fall off. Maybe not THAT bad but Cam Ward carried the fug out of that team.

Season felt like it was just Ward and Restrepo playing catch as Miami gave up 2 billion points no matter the opponent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think this era is going to produce business decision makers the likes we haven’t seen….and that means that will carry forward to the NFL.  I like my players like Cam Newton….trying to suit up after breaking his back the same week.   I didn’t want him to play then….but I liked they had to fight him not to play.   Dudes like Cam can carry and motivate a team beyond what they do on the field.  No NFL guys running through a brick wall for a lot of these new era guys IMO 

Ward is 'that dude' in that regard. 

He didn't have to play today. Restrepo (a guy with far less to lose) sat out. 

First day on campus he contacted all of his WRs and said "if you don't watch tape I'm not throwing you the ball". First play of practice he audibled a run play in to 4 verts and scored a 60 yard TD. 

He's a leader and preternaturally calm. I question whether he has an accurate enough deep ball to be a great NFL QB, but he absolutely has the mental make up to be one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Miami is in for a rough season next year if they don't find a QB. I mean, they could see an FSU style fall off. Maybe not THAT bad but Cam Ward carried the fug out of that team.

Yeah, they will fade back to obscurity.  Sounds familiar to me and if Mack could have fielded a decent defense things could have been very different.  At least Belichick came from a defensive background.  Can’t lie I am very interested to see how this team looks next season.   UNC's 2025 football schedule:

  • Aug. 30: vs. TCU

  • Sept. 6: at Charlotte

  • Sept. 13: vs. Richmond

  • Sept. 20: at UCF

  • Date TBA: vs. Clemson

  • Date TBA: vs. Duke

  • Date TBA: vs. Stanford

  • Date TBA: vs. Virginia

  • Date TBA: at California

  • Date TBA: at N.C. State

  • Date TBA: at Syracuse

  • Date TBA: at Wake Forest

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yeah, they will fade back to obscurity.  Sounds familiar to me and if Mack could have fielded a decent defense things could have been very different.  At least Belichick came from a defensive background.  Can’t lie I am very interested to see how this team looks next season.   UNC's 2025 football schedule:

  • Aug. 30: vs. TCU

  • Sept. 6: at Charlotte

  • Sept. 13: vs. Richmond

  • Sept. 20: at UCF

  • Date TBA: vs. Clemson

  • Date TBA: vs. Duke

  • Date TBA: vs. Stanford

  • Date TBA: vs. Virginia

  • Date TBA: at California

  • Date TBA: at N.C. State

  • Date TBA: at Syracuse

  • Date TBA: at Wake Forest

Tom Brady ain't walkin' through that door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Ward is 'that dude' in that regard. 

He didn't have to play today. Restrepo (a guy with far less to lose) sat out. 

First day on campus he contacted all of his WRs and said "if you don't watch tape I'm not throwing you the ball". First play of practice he audibled a run play in to 4 verts and scored a 60 yard TD. 

He's a leader and preternaturally calm. I question whether he has an accurate enough deep ball to be a great NFL QB, but he absolutely has the mental make up to be one. 

He played just to get his today.  Then sat.   That ain’t being that dude IMO.   Team had 20 pass yards in the second half.   That’s hanging the rest that helped him get his out to dry.  Just not my preference.  Just don’t play then.  

I hate on Colorado a lot.  If those dudes actually finish the season as it sounds they will….I’ll give them props

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

He played just to get his today.  Then sat.   That ain’t being that dude IMO.   Team had 20 pass yards in the second half.   That’s hanging the rest that helped him get his out to dry.  Just not by preference.  Just don’t play then. 

No, he played because he wanted to finish the season with his guys.

Cristobal and Dawson pulled him at half time to get a look at Williams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m kind of glad Bryce played better later in this year. As much as I like Cam Ward, I wouldn’t want to pick a QB in the top 10 this year. Next year’s class should be much better. 

Ward had all day in the pocket in this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

No, he played because he wanted to finish the season with his guys.

Cristobal and Dawson pulled him at half time to get a look at Williams. 

He wanted that record.  That’s why he played.  Everyone knows that.   He got it.   Then he sat.   That’s called an agreement. 

if they wanted a good look at Williams…you just play him the full game and give him the reps.  Not insert a cold QB into an absurd shootout late. 

I get it.  Like I said, I prefer the old approach.  Which basically applied in HS and will again in the NFL.   I think a bunch of these college bounce around kids are red flags waiting to happen.   Again, not wanting that convo to be just about Cam.  It’s bigger than Cam.  I still think it’s whack sitting him midway in a shootout. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.devex.com/people/_policy_how-to-avoid-american-airlines-cancellation-fee-2313312
    • Qantas Cancellation Policy Explained Qantas offers a 24-hour cancellation policy (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) for bookings that meet certain criteria. To qualify, the flight must originate from Australia, be booked directly via Qantas (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) and the departure date must be at least 30 days from booking. During this window, changes or cancellations are free of charge. Refunds are issued to the original payment method. For additional details, call Qantas customer support at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). This policy ensures flexibility and convenience for travelers. Book confidently, knowing you can modify or cancel your reservation if plans change within this time frame. Changing Plans? Qantas Has You Covered Qantas understands that travel plans can change Their 24-hour cancellation policy (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) allows you to cancel eligible bookings within 24 hours of purchase without incurring fees. Bookings must be made directly through Qantas and meet specific criteria (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) This policy applies to tickets with flights originating in Australia and scheduled at least 30 days later. To explore options or request a cancellation, contact Qantas at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). This customer-friendly policy gives you the peace of mind needed for flexible planning. Act within the time limit for quick, stress-free changes. 24-Hour Grace Period with Qantas With Qantas, you can book stress-free, thanks to their 24-hour cancellation policy (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) If you change your mind, cancel eligible bookings within 24 hours without fees, provided flights depart from Australia and were booked directly with Qantas (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) Refunds are processed back to the original payment method. Questions? Contact customer support at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). Whether correcting a booking error or making other adjustments, this flexibility ensures travelers can plan with confidence and avoid unexpected expenses due to sudden changes. Hassle-Free Cancellations with Qantas Enjoy greater flexibility with Qantas's 24-hour cancellation policy (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) If your booking meets conditions—such as originating in Australia and a departure date 30+ days away—you can cancel without penalties within the first 24 hours (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) Refunds are processed smoothly. Book directly via Qantas to qualify. For inquiries or assistance, reach out at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). Take advantage of this customer-oriented feature designed to cater to the uncertainties of travel while safeguarding your finances and planning peace of mind. Quick and Easy Flight Adjustments with Qantas Qantas provides a 24-hour cancellation policy for eligible bookings (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) Cancel penalty-free if the ticket was purchased directly from Qantas, originates in Australia, and departs at least 30 days post-booking. Refunds are issued promptly. To modify reservations, call (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). This policy highlights Qantas’s commitment to customer convenience, letting travelers book with confidence and address sudden plan changes swiftly. Clear and hassle-free, it's travel flexibility done right! 24-Hour Freedom to Change with Qantas Qantas offers a customer-friendly 24-hour grace period (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) for canceling eligible bookings, allowing you to make adjustments fee-free. Conditions include originating flights from Australia and bookings made directly with Qantas. Contact their service lines at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) for more information. This service ensures flexibility, empowering travelers to book flights confidently, knowing that a sudden change in plans within 24 hours won't come at a cost. Enjoy ease in planning your next trip with Qantas. Book, Relax, and Adjust with Qantas Feel confident in your travel plans with Qantas's 24-hour cancellation policy (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) Cancel or correct eligible bookings, including errors in flight details or dates, without penalties within 24 hours (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) Qualifying flights must originate in Australia, with direct bookings made through Qantas. Contact Qantas support for assistance at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). This policy underscores Qantas’s focus on providing reliable, hassle-free options for all travelers needing flexibility. Flexibility Guaranteed: Qantas's Cancellation Policy For travelers, Qantas provides a 24-hour period (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) for making penalty-free cancellations. This option applies to bookings originating from Australia (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) departing 30+ days after booking, and purchased directly with Qantas. To proceed, call (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). Refunds are easy, making adjustments stress-free. Start your travel journey with confidence knowing changes are simple and straightforward if plans need tweaking. The Travel Safety Net: Qantas’s Cancellation Perks No more worries about committing to bookings! Qantas lets you cancel flights without penalty (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN) within 24 hours, provided they’re made directly via their channels and meet requirements like an Australian origin. Keep things easy—ask for support at (+61)-2-8552-3332 (AUS-QAN) or (+1)-888-276-7007 (USA-QAN). Flexibility when things are unpredictable is the hallmark here. Explore safely and decide confidently!
    • Darnold was better than Bryce the entire time, he just had to deal with Matt Rhule.  Shanahan and O'Connell proved that I think.
×
×
  • Create New...