Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

These playoffs are a joke so far. Strength of Schedule should really be a consideration in the future. 

Not saying that Bama should be in, but South Carolina or Ole Miss would have absolutely had better showings. 

I think people, not saying here, suddenly have forgotten how routinely teams got smashed in the 4 team format though 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

These playoffs are a joke so far. Strength of Schedule should really be a consideration in the future. 

Not saying that Bama should be in, but South Carolina or Ole Miss would have absolutely had better showings. 

They will get better at this but SMU and Indiana had no business being here IMO.  Any one of those teams u mentioned would completely dominate either of them.  

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

This is an embarrassment to the committee 

It could be. There will certainly be something for the Alabama crowd to gripe about. There has been a real emphasis on trying to create the same excitement for this that is a part of the basketball tournament. The thing is, we have seen the little guys in college football already fail repeatedly to knock off the big programs, so I am not sure why expanding the field to officially include them would necessarily bring different results. There's already talk here and there about expanding it further to 16, and there is no good reason for that either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think people, not saying here, suddenly have forgotten how routinely teams got smashed in the 4 team format though 

Valid point, but those blowouts were at the hands of the teams that would go on to play in the NCCG. These blowouts have been at the hands of teams that may very well lose in the quarterfinals. That’s not the same thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

It could be. There will certainly be something for the Alabama crowd to gripe about. There has been a real emphasis on trying to create the same excitement for this that is a part of the basketball tournament. The thing is, we have seen the little guys in college football already fail repeatedly to knock off the big programs, so I am not sure why expanding the field to officially include them would necessarily bring different results. There's already talk here and there about expanding it further to 16, and there is no good reason for that either.

The issue is the notion that all conferences and conference champs are created equally, when that just isn’t the case. 11-2 in the ACC is not the same as 9-3 in the SEC or B1G. The highest ranked G5 champion is very rarely going to be on the same level as the 3rd or 4th place B1G/SEC team. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

Valid point, but those blowouts were at the hands of the teams that would go on to play in the NCCG. These blowouts have been at the hands of teams that may very well lose in the quarterfinals. That’s not the same thing. 

Well that’s true as well, most of that thrashing were by teams that played for the natty and often won it.   Now maybe you could argue Notre Dame is going to handle teams but I don’t think this Penn St team is. 

SMU doesn’t have the OL to play in these games nor the QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

The issue is the notion that all conferences and conference champs are created equally, when that just isn’t the case. 11-2 in the ACC is not the same as 9-3 in the SEC or B1G. The highest ranked G5 champion is very rarely going to be on the same level as the 3rd or 4th place B1G/SEC team. 

Well also, none of these teams not showing up thus far were even conference champs.    I’m also not sure the BIG and SEC should be talked about so comparably either though.   There is the SEC and 4 weaker power 5s of different varieties 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well also, none of these teams not showing up thus far were even conference champs.    I’m also not sure the BIG and SEC should be talked about so comparably either though.   There is the SEC and 4 weaker power 5s of different varieties 

Then it becomes, as Finebaum has a bit sarcastically said, the Alabama Invitational. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

Then it becomes, as Finebaum has a bit sarcastically said, the Alabama Invitational. 

I think they should just rank them 1-12.  No byes for champs .  And then you let the lower seeds basically have play in games.  

SMU and Indiana and the likes really should be playing Boise State, ASU, Clemson, etc.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well also, none of these teams not showing up thus far were even conference champs.    I’m also not sure the BIG and SEC should be talked about so comparably either though.   There is the SEC and 4 weaker power 5s of different varieties 

I’m an SEC homer, so I was trying to be unbiased. Haha

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And these very well could be too.

I doubt ND and PSU will both be playing the NCCG. It could happen but it’s unlikely. 

Additionally, the past blowouts were against teams that were supposedly the #3 and #4 teams in the country. These were against teams ranked #8 and #10 who each struggled mightily in their regular season games against legit opponents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think they should just rank them 1-12.  No byes.  And then you let the lower seeds basically have play in games.  

SMU and Indiana and the likes really should be playing Boise State, ASU, Clemson, etc.  

if you seeded 1-12, SMU and Indiana wouldn’t be playing teams like Clemson and ASU. They’d be playing teams like Oregon and Georgia. Those games would be even worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10672430 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10672440
    • Using the PDF file and this https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/04/01/nfl-draft-carolina-panthers-visits-tracker/82752256007/ as reference  All-Star Circuit Memphis WR Roc Taylor (Hula Bowl) Virginia Tech WR Ali Jennings (Hula Bowl) Iowa LB Nick Jackson (Hula Bowl) Minnesota DE Danny Striggow (Hula Bowl) Colorado EDGE BJ Green II (Hula Bowl) Utah RB Micah Bernard (Hula Bowl) Liberty RB Quinten Cooley (Hula Bowl) Louisiana-Monroe CB Car’lin Vigers (Hula Bowl) Missouri QB Brady Cook (Shrine Bowl) Arizona RB Jacory Croskey-Merritt (Shrine Bowl) Auburn TE Rivaldo Fairweather (Shrine Bowl) Iowa TE Luke Lachey (Shrine Bowl) SMU DE Elijah Roberts (Shrine Bowl) South Carolina DT Terrell Hemingway (Shrine Bowl) Penn State CB Jalen Kimber (Shrine Bowl) Indiana DT CJ West (Shrine Bowl) Texas-San Antonio DT Joe Evans (Shrine Bowl) Ole Miss LB Chris Paul Jr (Shrine Bowl) Delaware CB Tyron Herring (Shrine Bowl) Top 30/Local Visits South Carolina S Nick Emmanwori Auburn RB Jarquez Hunter UCLA EDGE Oluwafemi Oladejo Virginia S Jonas Sanker Iowa State WR Jaylin Noel Georgia DT Warren Brinson Arizona WR Tetaira McMillan Louisville CB Quincy Riley Kentucky DT Deone Walker Florida LB Shemar James Minnesota T Aireontae Ersery Georgia LB Jalon Walker Oklahoma State RB Ollie Gordon II Florida DT Cam Jackson Pro Day Meetings Syracuse EDGE Fadil Diggs Ole Miss DT JJ Pegues Towson TE Carter Runyon Colorado WR LaJohntay Wester (virtual meeting) Boston College T Ozzy Trapilo Boston College C Drew Kendall Georgia LB Jalon Walker Alabama EDGE Que Robinson Temple S Andreas Keaton Combine Formal Interviews Florida DT Cam Jackson Iowa LB Jay Higgins (informal meeting) Ole Miss CB Trey Amos Texas A&M DE Shemar Stewart (official meeting) Iowa State CB Darien Porter Georgia S Malaki Starks Oklahoma State EDGE Collin Oliver (met w/LB coaches) Purdue G/C Marcus Mbow Arizona State RB Cam Skattebo Oregon T Josh Conerly Miami K Andres Borregales (met w/ass ST coach) Georgia LB Jalon Walker Miami WR Sam Brown Jr
    • https://intercom.help/airsupportticket/en/articles/11013321-fixing-a-name-error-on-american-airlines-at-the-last-minute https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670184 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670189   https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670335 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670342 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670353 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670354 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670356 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670358 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670359 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670377 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670376 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670381   https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670442 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670453 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670454 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670455 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670450 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670464 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670463   https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670547 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670548 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670549 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670551 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670552 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670553 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670554   https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670971 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670972 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670973 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670975 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670976 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10670977 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671175 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671176 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671177 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671178 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671179 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671180   https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671323 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671326 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671329 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671330 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671331 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671333 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671335 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671498 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671499 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671500 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671501 https://page.onstove.com/quarter/gb/view/10671503
×
×
  • Create New...