Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Arizona St being in the playoffs feels so wrong.

 

Colorado decided to show up the last 2 weeks. Can't believe they blew it vs Kansas of all teams.

 

 

What I wish, is they would say screw the technical bowl requirements.....and have Colorado or Miami play a team built like South Carolina.  Let the nation see the two biggest holders of the ball vs a good SEC defensive front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

There is literally a scenario where Clemson could win the whole thing and South Carolina can pull a 2017 UCF and claim it for themselves as well. 

 

Insanity. 

I welcome such insanity.  I welcome the Gamecocks mental gymnastics as well. As Dabo said yesterday, they were the first 15-0 national champ, why not be the first 3 loss champ.  My favorite part is how self-aware Dabo is off the hate of him/Clemson....and how annoyed people will be if they even win the ACC.  

but regardless, I'm pulling for the lowest seeds until they are eliminated.  Well, outside of UNLV.  I want Boise St in and see Jeanty vs a good D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Why do you keep mentioning Miami I don't care about them lol

NFL board.  Ward and Sanders are projected as some variation of 1 and 2.  A matchup like a SC would be super relevant to the draft and NFL.....because it pits them against a team that would potentially take advantage at their perceived flaws (and they have the same flaw).   So, I use the 2 QBs interchangeably.  Both would provide that opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

NFL board.  Ward and Sanders are projected as some variation of 1 and 2.  A matchup like a SC would be super relevant to the draft and NFL.....because it pits them against a team that would potentially take advantage at their perceived flaws (and they have the same flaw).   So, I use the 2 QBs interchangeably.  Both would provide that opportunity. 

I mean people have been saying this draft was weak in terms of the QB position. This is nothing new. I also agree that Sanders holds the ball a lot. He's gonna struggle if he does that at the next level.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Colorado decided to show up the last 2 weeks. Can't believe they blew it vs Kansas of all teams.

It's pretty simple if you take off the blinders. They lost to Nebraska and Kansas because they're just not that good. They're a borderline top 20 type of team that's good enough to play with the top teams if they're on their A game but are flawed enough to lose to practically anyone any given week if they're not on their A game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's pretty simple if you take off the blinders. They lost to Nebraska and Kansas because they're just not that good. They're a borderline top 20 type of team that's good enough to play with the top teams if they're on their A game but are flawed enough to lose to practically anyone any given week if they're not on their A game.

You can literally say this about Alabama who loss to Vanderbilt.

 

What about Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois 

Any team can be beat unless you're Oregon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I think the winner of the ACC championship should get the one and only playoff spot.

 

You can't have more than 1 ACC team in the playoffs. The conference is not that great to be getting multiple teams.

SEC/BIG10 isn't good enough to take up 8-9 spots.    Almost every year Clemson made it in the past, most argued the ACC didn't deserve that spot either.   Which proved itself to be SEC fan fiction. This is just the continuation of that same thing but trickled down.  There are no dominate teams in football this year. 

Took UGA 3483 OTs to take down GT last week.  SMU should 100% be in, win or lose.  How would you jump Indiana over them that doesn't even play? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You can literally say this about Alabama who loss to Vanderbilt.

 

What about Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois 

Any team can be beat unless you're Oregon.

Oregon was losing in the 4th quarter to a one man show RB from the Mountain West.  That's why sports is fun.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CURRENT DRAFT ORDER 1.  Raiders   2-11 (SOS .538)  Remaining Schedule: Raiders have a chance to win 1 more game, maybe 2, but 1 is probably a reach with Ridder as the QB.  Revenge game vs. Atlanta, Lowly Jacksonville, and struggling New Orleans--I am guessing they could win 1.  Predicted finish 3-14. 2.  Giants   2-11 (SOS .542)   Remaining Schedule: If the Giants are going to find a win, it will probably not be until December 29 vs. Indy at home.  I think they will lose out, however.  Predicted finish: 2-15. 3.  Patriots  3-10  (SOS .462)  Remaining schedule: If the Patriots are going to win another game, it will be at home vs. Buffalo on January 5.  Buffalo will likely be resting starters.  I think the Pats will want a win and get it. Predicted finish 4-13. 4 Panthers 3-10  (SOS .484)  Remaining Schedule: Carolina hosts the Cowturds (I just made that up) this week. Dallas has 1 win vs. 6 road losses this year, and the Panthers are playing better.  All odds suggest the Cats win--I think it is a coin toss.  I do not see a win down the home stretch, but Tampa and Atlanta are possible.  Predicted finish:  4-13. 5. Jaguars 3-10 (SOS .489) Remaining schedule: Jags have the opportunity to win 4 of 4 down the stretch with their backup QB.  I think the Jets beat them, but they will win vs. Tennessee and possibly Vegas and Indy.  Predicted finish: 5-12 6.  Titans 3-10 (SOS .511) Remaining Schedule: The Titans should have a decent chance of winning their remaining games;  I give them 1 win down the stretch, however.  They will beat Indy or Jags.  Predicted finish: 4-13. 7. Jets 3-10 (SOS .516)  Remaining Schedule: Jets travel to Jax to play Jags Sunday.  I think they win it, lose the next three.  Predicted Finish:  4-13. 8. Browns 3-10 (SOS .525)  Remaining schedule: The tea leaves show no more wins for Cleveland. Predicted finish:  3-14. 9.  Bears 4-9  (SOS .566)  Remaining Schedule: Where is another win coming from?  Predicted finish, 4-13. PREDICTED DRAFT ORDER USING CURRENT STRENGTHS OF SCHEDULE (SOS): 1. Giants 2-15 (.543)  Primary Need:  Quarterback.  Gotta be Ward, doesn't it? 2. Cleveland 3-14 (.525)  Primary Need:  Quarterback or OT depending on their position on Watson--never have a better opportunity to draft a QB.  They could go Hunter, and if Sanders is the only QB left, Daddy Sanders has been pushing for Vegas.  Eli Manning to Chargers situation again?  3. Raiders 3-14 (.538)  Quarterback--if not there, Hunter CB. 4. Patriots 4-13 (.462)  Wide Receiver--this makes it interesting for Panthers--if they take TMc, what to do? 5.  Panthers 4-13 (.484)  Edge or Wide Receiver.  6.  Titans 4-13 (.511)  Wide Receiver or OT 7.  Jets 4-13 (.516)  Defensive Tackle 8.  Bears 4-13 (.566)  Offensive Tackle 9.  Jaguars 5-12  (.489)  Cornerback  
    • https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100 https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100 https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100 https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100 https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100
    • https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100 https://www.devex.com/people/como-hablo-con-una-persona-real-en-avianca-2161100
×
×
  • Create New...