Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Call can be argued either way, but me thinks the "ACC Control Room" wants to make sure they have someone in the BYE spot in the tournament.

Or, y'know, they're following the actual rules of the sport and it's clearly not a catch. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yeah I think they made the correct call

You can’t say “well the call on the field is a TD so there’s nothing there to reverse it” when the only reason it was called a TD on field was so they could go look at it

They can and would look at it regardless of how it was called on the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I personally don't want a QB with our 1st. I want Hunter or Tmac and Canales gets his project QB later in the draft.

 

Saying that if we do go QB Sanders is the best I have seen. The thing that sells me is he's having success behind a terrible Oline. Just imagine if he got a decent Oline he would really show out.

I have no problem with skipping Qb IF you think there is blue chip defensive player available. Its gotta be somebody with a high ceiling for me or Travis Hunter because he is dual threat. I just wouldnt rule out QB because we still need a future guy who can sit behind Dalton for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Or, y'know, they're following the actual rules of the sport and it's clearly not a catch. 

I don’t think it was a catch….but I don’t see how you can overturn it either given they called it a catch.  Not then the criteria required.

ACC made a business decision during review 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I have no problem with skipping Qb IF you think there is blue chip defensive player available. Its gotta be somebody with a high ceiling for me or Travis Hunter because he is dual threat. I just wouldnt rule out QB because we still need a future guy who can sit behind Dalton for a while.

I’m not drafting a guy to sit in the top 10.  Take a guy in the 2nd or 3rd for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay, that day in Vegas had to embarrass him completely. Andy showed him how to do the job.  What I think when I go there, why did it take Andy? He has had game after game of watching actual NFL QBs work and that didn't do it?  Anyhow Andy did not mess around, he stood in there and did his job and got rid of the ball ahead of the pressure. Down the field. With the same players Bryce had. Night and day.  If that didn't wake him up nothing ever would. But I don't think he has any sort of top NFL QB in him, he just lacks the full tool kit. 
    • Team is dangerous right now, all four lines are contributing and the speed at which the guys play at is tremendous.
    • And every nfl player wannabe tries to up their draft position through things like the combine and theyre all basically lying though those drills theyve practiced hundreds of times that have little bearing on if theyre a good football player. The pro days are even worse. All you have to do is dupe 1 team. Is it right? No. But until teams put more emphasis on college tape vs. What they did in shorts with no defense it'll happen every year. I doubt there is a single player that wouldn't try anything to up their draft prospects.  Young had years of tape and that shouldve been what the decision was based on. Not a scale and throwing in shorts.  ( btw I think the combine and pro days are 90% a waste of time) Young has it financially made already. It's up to him if he wants to be a good football player too. I think the benching was the best thing that could've happened to him. It remains to be seen if it was enough
×
×
  • Create New...