Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

ECU is dominating App too. In the second half, UGA was basically a video game in easy mode too.

Sure, but UGA could smash basically anyone in college football for 2 quarters on a given Sat.  In what was largely a home opener crowd wise.   And I think that’s basically the narrative setter right now. 

Maybe Miami will be significantly better.  I still think the best roster and coached team in the ACC is in Clemson though as of right now.  So I just can’t put a gap yet between Clemson and any ACC school 

BUT, as Clemson has proven on both sides of the coin….where your talent is and isn’t matters.  Miami might have it where it matters most and that’s enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

ECU has never been a great program, but they had some decent teams under Coach Ruff. They've been poo ever since they fired him.

Besides the Jeff Blake peach bowl season the best times have been with David Garrard and Steve Logan.  That was a long ass time ago.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

They’re just not that good man lol.  I don’t think beating old dominion is getting in anyone’s head.

I don't know. I know they're bad, but they've equaled their win record from last season already. And this is ECU we're talking about. They let anything go to their heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...