Waiver Claims

[PantherPhann89]

4 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Dumpster diving the Seahawks I see

Dumpster diving the Seahawks or picking players they think fits the system...

[KillerKat]

22 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

I don’t really care about these bottom roster spots other than hoping we at some point have decent backups, but Moore over ISM for special teams? Did we watch the game tape? Moore turned in a return to the 14 yard line because he was going backwards when he caught the ball and ISM had a great catch and run to the 50. The stark difference in the return capabilities made me post in another thread that I hope we don’t keep Moore over ISM for returns. 

I hate this team never takes returning seriously. They may for like a year or 2, but then suddenly are like: Nah, fug it.

[PNW_PantherMan]

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I hate this team never takes returning seriously. They may for like a year or 2, but then suddenly are like: Nah, fug it.

Bring back Michael Bates!

[PootieNunu]

27 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

I don’t really care about these bottom roster spots other than hoping we at some point have decent backups, but Moore over ISM for special teams? Did we watch the game tape? Moore turned in a return to the 14 yard line because he was going backwards when he caught the ball and ISM had a great catch and run to the 50. The stark difference in the return capabilities made me post in another thread that I hope we don’t keep Moore over ISM for returns. 

You forgot one thing, ISM never played for the Seahawks.........

[CRA]

46 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

I just put that in the new google translator and set it to coach speak…

[Jackie Lee]

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I just put that in the new google translator and set it to coach speak…

Yeah so why keep Ian Thomas and David Moore who are proven jags over higher upside guys that need "development"

[frankw]

56 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

I'm not going to say we needed a "packed" WR's room. But. We did have the worst passing offense in the NFL last year......

[Byrdman4real]

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah so why keep Ian Thomas and David Moore who are proven jags over higher upside guys that need "development"

Hate to say it, but this staff has favorites. Moore over ISM doesn't make sense. The return game is very important. Field position can determine a game. 

[Jon Snow]

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah so why keep Ian Thomas and David Moore who are proven jags over higher upside guys that need "development"

My guess Moore was kept for his receiving abilities and as for Ian I really don't know. I would say a lot of it had to do with who had a better grasp of the offense at this point,  maybe? I would not worry too much about it as those two are only here as placeholders until the have a better option. It appears they plan to feature the TE a lot so it would explain only carrying 5 wr. 

[Jackie Lee]

 

[thennek]

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

Well that is concerning….what a terrible signing DJ Wonnum turned out to be. The guy is signed in the off season to be a starter and is not ready to play. Waste of money….

Edited August 28 by thennek

[jayboogieman]

20 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

Hate to say it, but this staff has favorites.

[strato]

3 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Outside of the enigma that is Ian Thomas, David Moore being here as a vet who has come and gone before is the only other spot that seems a bit uninspiring. But realistically, our WR5 isn’t getting substantial production anyways.

This ISM Moore thing is based on ISM was dinged up probably, plus they cut the WRs short so whatever returner that is the better WR is kept. 

This is pretty fluid still I think. 

After week one, the expensive vets' contracts do not need to be guaranteed. 

 

edit: And as for KR, who the hell knows how that is going go? Less certainty may affect investment motivation. 

Edited August 28 by strato

[Jackie Lee]