Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers acquire cornerback Michael Jackson in trade with Seahawks

Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Not to say that we lose any positioning, but that when we put in that first waiver claim it won't have to be for a DB and the team ends up missing out on OL/QB3/EDGE.

To my understanding (and please, somebody correct me if I'm wrong), being first in priority doesn't mean that the Panthers get all of their players that they put in a claim for but rather they'll get the first one, and if the second one goes unclaimed by the remainder of the league they'll be able to land them, and so on.

Still trying to find clear and concise rules though to make sure. The way that I understand it to work means that the Panthers can put that first claim towards OL, QB3, or EDGE instead of putting in for the CB first and potentially losing a guy at one of those other positions that they want to bring in.

I have read two or three things and that particular procedure is elusive. I know in FF we used to go to the back of the line. 

We will get our pick of them all though, at least. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, strato said:

I have read two or three things and that particular procedure is elusive. I know in FF we used to go to the back of the line. 

We will get our pick of them all though, at least. 

I'm looking at two different write ups where one says we'll get whoever we want when it comes time to put in a claim during those first 3 weeks like you mentioned while the other says it's not that way.

I guess we'll find out next Tuesday/Wednesday. Personally, I want it to be the way you suggested where the team can just claim whoever tf they want and roll from there. 😛

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)

When I saw that I said, well that was something Fitterer couldn’t trade away (because he would have).

Vested Vets bypass waivers until after the trade deadline. Then, they have to pass through. 

Meaning I think, 4 years (?) experience gets vested status

 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

While we had Seattle on the phone we should've seen if we could've gotten Howell in exchange for Bryce.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calm down, I'm just kidding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because they would've just laughed at us.

The sad part this is actually true.

 

Based on last season you can't convince me Howell would be a better option than Bryce moving forward.

 

Good thing is Bryce has a chance to redeem himself this season. If he has another stinker good chance we move on. The size thing still has me doubting his abilities, but his college tape gives me hope he can figure it out. Hopefully he proves us all wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCBlu Experienced

NCBlu

Posted
Posted

I liked Barrett at Mich and wanted to see what he could do for the team. ST ace writing all over him at worst. All fight was also the highest rated guy on Def this last Panthers game(didn't watch so)

The Panthers definitely needed CBs though so this sounds like the rare win-win for both.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SOJA said:

This is a home run trade. Getting a contributing piece to a team for a 7th rounder is good business. ESPECIALLY considering according to Mike Kaye Barrett was likely going to get cut 

Jackson probably was too. This was just two teams swapping trash on the chance that someone else's trash was a better fit for their roster than their current trash.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Jackson probably was too. This was just two teams swapping trash on the chance that someone else's trash was a better fit for their roster than their current trash.

yes but then we (the worst team in the league) are competing for the services of an established veteran corner which 85% of the teams in the league could use 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Im here to poop on Morgan some.

 

 

At a first glance, I still don't know how to feel. Jackson started in 22 and had a great year. Before that, he bounced around. Then seahawks tendered him and gave him a 167,000 SB(rip). COme draft they spent 2 picks on CBs and it was looking like Jackson is going to be the odd man out.

 

Morgan already spent a early 3rd on LB and spent another 7th on Barrentt. Gave him a 23,000 SB (rip dead cap)* but he's under contract for 4 very cheap years. 

 

I swear go down the draft pick list-

1st- Injuries and looking like bench player

2nd- On PUP looking like he is going to miss the first 6 weeks

3rd- Backup and SPer *future MLB starter in 25??

4th- Backup and struggling to block

5th- Top backup, *future NB in 25??

6th- Loookinng cut currently and injured like most of the rookies have been

7th- Trade for a one year player that started in the past. 

UDFA- nothing that's made the Twitter news

Most around here agree, this is the weakest NFL roster and Dan Morgan had one draft pick in each round. No starters and half the picks will not be on the team for the first 6 weeks. 

Terrible start. 

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • HPPantherzfan
      2024 College Football Thread

      By HPPantherzfan · Posted

      I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • MHS831
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By MHS831 · Posted

      What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...