Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would the Carolina Panthers move on from QB Bryce Young?

jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Maybe I should take the under to hedge my enjoyment of this season.  I think anything more than 5 games is optimistic.  Not impossible, but its pushing the definition of modest for me.  I respect your optimism.

I feel like the division is pretty garbo so should be able to go .500 against Falcons/Saints/Bucs. That just means 3 more wins out of the 11 other games to hit the over (eyeing Raiders, Bears, Commanders, Broncos, Giants, and Cardinals games as ones Panthers should be competitive in). 

Won 2 games last year with probably the most heinous offensive coaching staff and offensive production in Panthers history and lost another 6 by 8 points or less. 6 wins with a hopefully improved OL and much better offensive coaching/skill players should be achievable IMO.

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Maybe I should take the under to hedge my enjoyment of this season.  I think anything more than 5 games is optimistic.  Not impossible, but its pushing the definition of modest for me.  I respect your optimism.

I went 6 without looking at who and when and where but I‘d rather be one too high than one too low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Gipetto said:

I hate this impatient ass fan base soooo much.

If you are saying what I think maybe you are saying... The last 5 years has been a yearly I want everything right now fest. Mostly the QB thing driving it. 

One year after the next, same thing. Yeah

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I love you too

He actually came back to poo your post. Comical levels of butt hurt.

It's interesting that those who talk the most about other fans being the problem are just as if not more toxic.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gipetto said:

I hate this impatient ass fan base soooo much.

How you doing bro, I member you form the scout forums days. My memory sucks, but were you the one that painted?? I miss those days. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bandu Proficient

bandu

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gipetto said:

I hate this impatient ass fan base soooo much.

 if you in fact  hate impatient people then i guess that means you also hate the owner David Tepper ...just saying 

 

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...