Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roster Cuts in 2 Weeks


Iceup
 Share

Recommended Posts

TMJ is gone and David Moore makes the roster. Coker gets practice squad and ready to be called up for any injuries.

I would say Miles Sanders gets traded but nobody is taking on his contract going off of what his production was last season so he will not be traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

This is the first season in my Panthers fandom (started day one) that I can't even name every starter. So me even knowing who is in line to be cut or stay is about as impossible as pigs flying.

defensively, I struggle once I get past Brown, Horn, Shaq and Clowney....yet that probably is the best part about the team lol. 

I mean, technically, I can go further but not with the ease of prior eras. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean it's more about finding immediate upgrades off the waiver wire which they should take complete advantage of. Seems as of last week they have a good 15-20 positions that could be upgraded if the right players get cut off other teams

You have to think they’d sign several to upgrade the bottom of the roster- heck a few might even start and play a large portion of meaningful snaps. Hopefully we upgrade the C position, Edge, maybe even a true NT.

Edited by Iceup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about this in terms of winning this year, you wouldn’t probably fare so well talking large amounts of people that have to be trained in the offense or defense, this late in the game.

But if you are thinking the entire season is a training year, take all the upgrades you see and see how they come along with your system for a year.

I think this should be a training and learning year.

Any consideration of winning must be derailed. Learn how to win next year. The next year maybe the QB we take in 2025 is ready to help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Basbear said:

I say my surprise cut is this years 6th rounder DT Jaden Crumedy.

leave it to Morgan to cut a draft pick on the worse roster incoming,,,,,

just TJ Smith names keeps coming up. He had a sack in the PS too. Seems to be good with hands...

I guess this is good news, but he would make the 3rd backup DLmen panthers found out on the streets. 

I feel they will claim around 4-6 players and IR players on the roster. 

Yep. Could have took a flyer on a QB with that pick but they don’t want to give Bryce even slight competition 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

Yep. Could have took a flyer on a QB with that pick but they don’t want to give Bryce even slight competition 

Well when there's been rumblings out of camp that Plummer and Luton have noticeably more zip on the ball than our QB1.. its not good.  Any QB that's gonna make an NFL roster would have stirred the pot.  It seems deliberate to me, but I'll just sit over here with my tinfoil hat and my bowl of popcorn.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shake up the TE room!

Jordan Matthew stakes his claim

There's an interesting dynamic brewing in the tight-end room. Tommy Tremble and Ian Thomas have missed several practices due to injury. Stephen Sullivan was released, leaving an opportunity for others to stake their claim.

Jordan Matthews has seized the moment more than most. The veteran is all business and looking to maximize the chance in front of him. This hasn't gone unnoticed by head coach Dave Canales, who lauded the player's work ethic and dependability based on comments via the team's website.

"He's doing a fantastic job. We can count on him. He's giving everything he's got on (special) teams, and especially just with that tight end group, just knowing you have a guy who's doing what he's supposed to do in there as we put our groups together is really valuable at this time, especially with Tommy and Ian not being there."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

Yep. Could have took a flyer on a QB with that pick but they don’t want to give Bryce even slight competition 

Quote

I agree with you, In the 5th I wanted them to toss a pick on a QB and had eyes on Jordan Travis. Even at that point the hater rattler would have been welcomed in my eyes. I liked what the pats did after drafting maye, Milton has some talent. Purdy was drafted a long with lance. Cousins was drafted with rg3. 

Panthers already had delhome, I doubt that happens again for some time. They shouldn't be scare to add legit competition for young, this is the NFL. 

 

I've statements like this more than few times, panthers in the know {{{{{ SHOULD know they need to add a QB or two. Dalton is 38 and gone after this year. If young continues to suck, panthers don't just need starter, but a backup as well.

Plus this roster is the weakest league wide and Im normally against carrying 3 QBs. But this weeak-ass roster can make room. Honestly panthers need another Jake delhomme miracle. A smart team would claim one of the cut and continue to make the team better. 

 

You can quote me on this- My ultra crazy prediction next year, panthers will sign Drew lock and roll with him in 2025 

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...