Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everybody hates Bryce - TC August 11th


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

give me a positive

Ummmmmmm, If we end up losing all 17 games we will probably be in line for the number one pick again and we won't even have to have that argument over tanking as it will just happen naturally if we stink as bad as we looked on offense the first preseason game.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

give me a positive

The defense looked improved against the run.

BC, Mays, and Zavala all looked serviceable and BC was able to play 100% of the snaps (good news regarding the recovery from the torn bicep).

Diontae Johnson and Jaycee Horn have been battling and looking strong.

JT has been getting more reps with Tremble + Thomas out and his blocking was better than originally advertised.

The All-22 of the game shows some interesting things scheme wise despite the lack of execution.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

The defense looked improved against the run.

BC, Mays, and Zavala all looked serviceable and BC was able to play 100% of the snaps (good news regarding the recovery from the torn bicep).

Diontae Johnson and Jaycee Horn have been battling and looking strong.

JT has been getting more reps with Tremble + Thomas out and his blocking was better than originally advertised.

The All-22 of the game shows some interesting things scheme wise despite the lack of execution.

cool, but bryce is still the straw that stirs this drink

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Reddit has been better lately and less miserable 

Reddit trends younger for sure.  Bunch of youngsters full of hope and dreams. 

Here?  The old timers?  We know when you don’t even have an actual C for a bad young QB…stuff like that only ends one way. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

cool, but bryce is still the straw that stirs this drink

I don't think it's healthy for you to gaslight yourself by denying reality and dismissing the positive performance by other players on the team just so that you can keep hating on the one you didn't want, but that's your bed to sleep in.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Reddit trends younger for sure.  Bunch of youngsters full of hope and dreams. 

Here?  The old timers?  We know when you don’t even have an actual C for a bad young QB…stuff like that only ends one way. 

Exactly. We have a guy who cant even deliver a good snap and the worst QB1 in the league...What could go wrong? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Icege said:

I don't think it's healthy for you to gaslight yourself by denying reality of the team's performance just so that you can keep hating on the one player you didn't want, but that's your choice to make.

I think someone has to be good at something to have haters, otherwise your just pointing out the obvious. Bryce sucks.

A Hater would be someone who denies Tom Bradys accomplishments. Not Jimmy Clausen 2.0

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...