Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trent Dilfer: "Bradford Not Even Close to best player in Draft"


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

So Trent Dilfer has no credibility because he is:

A) Not in the Hall of Fame

B) Bald

C) An arrogant douche

Got it.

i just choose not to believe him because he's a douche. the other two don't help the argument, but they don't hurt it either. kind of like how not everyone who has a mustache is a pedophile, but all pedophiles have mustaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think the rams taking Bradford at #1 is a major mistake. The guy has only had one good season and is coming of a pretty major injury. I feel that they should drop down pick up and extra second or third. They will still get an immediate starter in the 1st. Then at the top of the 2nd grab one of the QB's that fell a bit, since they always do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer explains that, in his view, Bradford hasn't been "challenged" in the college game, and that selecting Bradford could end up being a "catastrophic" mistake for the Rams.

If someone is critiquing the QB's I would want it to be from a skills point of view. Examples, can't throw the out route, bad decision making, takes too long to recognize the defense, choppy mechanics in the pocket or on deep passes ect.

I don't think you can knock Bradford because he hasn't be challenged... Maybe I do not understand the meaning of “challenged” in that context. To me Bradford played the same defenses as McCoy, and besides USC Clausen was never challenged by tough defenses either.

Rather Bradford is the next Peyton Manning or Ryan leaf he still is playing the same talent.... Don't think you can evaluate someone like that simply on who their competition was... There still the same player no matter whom they played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, if the question is whether Bradford is the best QB in the draft, I actually agree with him. I would gladly take McCoy, Suh or even Bradford (depending on your assesment of his intangibles) ahead of Sammy there. That doesn't mean I think he'll be horrible though, which Trent seems to be sold on. I just think there's better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off he is right Bradford is not the best player in the draft. But then again neither were Mark Sanchez and Matt Stafford last year. It is called positional value. Look it up. That said the Rams can not afford to pay another 1st round salary on the DLINE.

The SUH love fest is kinda on my nerves. Sam Bradford is very similar to Eli Manning. Spags could see that similarity to. This Colt McCoy love is BS to. The guy is your typical high profile college winner that does NOT have tools to win in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will take him, and I would too if I were in their shoes.

They need to sell the team, fill the seats, and win some games....D tackle helps, but not nearly as much as a "franchise" QB.

If they hit good on him, he can easily upgrade the team by 6-7 wins...and if they miss, they can't get any worse.

If they pick D line, they do not really win more games off the bat, hence can't sell the team for what it's worth, and are stuck picking in the top 5 again next year.

Take the QB, they are worth the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...