Bulger or Campbell

[bLACKpANTHER]

Campbell is still starter quality, will push Moore for the start position but it will probably cost us a draft pick (probably 4th or 5th)..

Bulger is older and is past his prime. He could mentor Moore more but wont push him for the spot. He will be had cheap since he was released.

Other...?

[Future of the Funchise]

Alex Smith

[necroplasm]

We have a solid offensive line so I choose Campbell. And Campbell isn't quite over the hill.

[Sam Mills Fan]

Bulger compliments Moore. Campbell, on the other hand, essentially IS Matt Moore.

The obvious choice is Marc Bulger.

[Darth Biscuit]

I don't think a miss on this choice would have drastic long term effects on the team... and since I've been pretty impressed with Moore, I would say Bulger for his experience and the help he would give Moore. Campbell would be purely competition for Moore and wouldn't bring much else other than a backup role. Bulger would be a decent backup and a mentor for Moore.

[Swarly]

Bulger because he's free(in terms of draft picks.)

With a 4th or 5th round pick we could get players that will have a bigger impact than a backup QB would.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Whichever one is under 30.

[DynastyRTR]

tough call...

only reason I go with Campbell is because he can make sure moore doesnt think that everything is all of a sudden his so to say. and if moore flops, we have campbell. and like said above, we have one of the best O-lines in the NFL. (ONLY if we could get him for a this years 6th and next years 6th or 5th.

[chknwing]

bulger, because hes a free agent, campbell would cost picks

[j2sgam]

F__k Campbell and f__k Bulger...Keep 'em both. Bring in someone unknown/unproven to test Moore. That is how we got Matt, no? that is how we got Jake, no? Sleepers are harder to find, but I will leave that in more capable hands...

[hepcat]

I say Bulger because we need a backup QB with enough talent and experience to start if the starter gets injured. He's good enough to push Moore to be better but not good enough to take his job. Campbell is not a bad choice either, but that would likely be an open competition. That and we need all the draft picks we can get this year.

[PantherDude]

Neither. I would've prefer Bulger if Panthers are force to pick one like they got a gun to their head. He wouldn't cost us some draft picks like Campbell would required. Like I said before, I doubt Campbell want to play where he won't be the starter after Fox clearly said Moore is the starter. If we don't get a QB in the Draft, I can see McCown & Cantwell as backups. Campbell isn't coming here.

[SorthNarolina]

I would go with bulger because he'll learn the playbook faster and be able to show matt a few things. We also don't have to trade for him which is big.

[MadHatter]

The only thing about Bulger is that I don't know if he has anything left in the tank.

The Saints had a seasoned vet (Brunnell) as their back-up and he sucked when called upon.