Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alternate timeline Panthers owner’s daughter is doing well at Wimbledon


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

True about offseason but since it was brought up, the NFL is seeming more and more like ‘the man’ as I go through life. 

It seems like the  divestment and subsequent acquisition was engineered. Like, they had a buyer they wanted.... hmmm where can we put him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wanted Navarro then and in hindsight really wish we got him instead of tepper, obviously. 

 

His daughter got smoked today in a match on paper she really should've won. But she's had a great year and is an exciting young American player. Bills owner's daughter Jess Pegula also a top tennis player. Being super rich certainly helps a young player develop in an expensive sport like tennis.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Is this one of the, the grass would have been Greener had another asshole billionaire bought the Panthers? 

 

Some high quality drugs are going around out there to believe that poo. 

As far as it goes, and fwiw, Navarro reached out to John Lynch  before Lynch went to SF about running things for him if he could get the franchise. According to Lynch.

Which sure sounds a lot better than what happened. I thought it said a lot about Navarro, like he is just more intuitive than the other guy who took two years to figure it out and then hired Rhule. 

 

Just sayin’. I know it is what it is now. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, strato said:

 

As far as it goes, and fwiw, Navarro reached out to John Lynch  before Lynch went to SF about running things for him if he could get the franchise. According to Lynch.

Which sure sounds a lot better than what happened. I thought it said a lot about Navarro, like he is just more intuitive than the other guy who took two years to figure it out and then hired Rhule. 

 

Just sayin’. I know it is what it is now. 

Lynch was hired in San Fran on January 29, 2017 about 11  months prior to the Richardson scandal was first mentiond on Dec 17, 2017. So that doesn't make a lot of sense unless Navarro wanted to trade for a GM. 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, strato said:

 

As far as it goes, and fwiw, Navarro reached out to John Lynch  before Lynch went to SF about running things for him if he could get the franchise. According to Lynch.

Which sure sounds a lot better than what happened. I thought it said a lot about Navarro, like he is just more intuitive than the other guy who took two years to figure it out and then hired Rhule. 

 

Just sayin’. I know it is what it is now. 

Back during the VETTING process, I liked Navarro for becoming the next owner.  That isn't going to make me sit here and honestly believe it would be drastically different or not.  I don't play what if games. There are to many variables, especially with a football team. 

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
×
×
  • Create New...