Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interested in Jason Campbell


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am all for bringin in Campbell.............. He is not that bad as people think. He is a good option to have on the roster and compete. Lets not forget the two lost season the past three because all the Panthers had was Jake. Having to many QB's on the roster that can start is never a bad thing. And if Moore crumbles or cant beat out Campbell than he doesnt deserve to be the starter. Many people complained Jake never had a QB on the roster pushing him so lets not make the same mistake with Moore.

I am ALL for bringing in Campbell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...

you love to gloat dont you?lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

edit- and I'm not saying Campbell is bad, I think he's had a rough tenure playing for the Skins behind a bad offensive line and a constantly changing offense.. but I just don't understand why people can't trust Moore. He's done just about everything he could possibly do to prove he's ready for the starting job. Gotta give the guy a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing says "faith in Matt Moore" and wanting to make sure he's not looking over his shoulder than bringing in a young guy that's been a starter for several years elsewhere.

This would be a very stupid move, so I fully expect it to happen.

It would be a very SMART move.

Just because you have faith in a QB does not mean that you do not have a solid and able back-up. Doing THAT would be a stupid move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

He will get moved for SIGNIFICANTLY less than his tender. I say he moves for no more than a 4th round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

It isn't that I don't like Marshall or anything like that...

I see it as this...

Richard Marshall is a great nickel corner... But he leaves a little to be desired as a starter... Ron Meeks' system had a lot more to do with our pass defense ranking than Richard Marshall...

Plus, I think we want to draft a CB in the 3rd or 4th round, or give Munnerlyn or Martin a shot at moving into the #2 spot... We invested a lot in Martin just for him to come in and be a backup FS... Just saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...