Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Call me crazy, but we might have improved the pass rush after all


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, strato said:

I may be off on this one but I see so much bullshit in general, that has stats to back it up. You can twist numbers all around by changing the way you get them.

At the end of the day it’s just how Clowney compares to Burns. I would think Wonnum is better than YGM at this point in his career and the rest are rotational rushers that would be a huge bonus if any of them can produce. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

I may be off on this one but I see so much bullshit in general, that has stats to back it up. You can twist numbers all around by changing the way you get them.

He wasn't using stats. He was pulling poo out of his ass.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hepcat said:

For as hyped as he was and as big of a name as he is, Clowneys stats are not that great. 

Well the hype was generational pass rusher.  Like hall of fame level player.  He's not that good but he is a good edge.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Well the hype was generational pass rusher.  Like hall of fame level player.  He's not that good but he is a good edge.

That term gets thrown around way too often. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

One could argue our RUSH defense should be much improved.  

An improved Rush defense combined with an improved offense, should inn theory, improve the pass rush just because of those 2 things. 

Bryce Young passes the ball to Xavier Leggette, XL turns up field and levels Derek Carr for a monster sack? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They obviously focused on stopping the run, if that's effective they would have more opportunities at 3rd and long pass rushes. Evero also is willing to send like 5,6,7 dudes on a blitz when he gets the chance. I'm not expecting any one player to consistently pressure the qb off the edge though

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, csx said:

Three times huh? 

Opponent Pass Attempts (per game):

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-pass-attempts-per-game

Carolina: 28 3

Minnesota: 35.6

 

 

 

 

Pass attempts is not the same as pass rush snaps. 
 

wonnum was one of 51 players with 300 pass rush snaps. His pass rush pressure rating was 43rd out 51, his win rate was last. He’s one of the most inefficient pass rushers in the nfl. 
 

Burns according to advanced stats on ESPN had 189 pass rush snaps and was doubled on 14% of them.

 

but let’s not compared Wonnum to Burns, that’s not fair to wonnum.
 

compare him to YGM.
 

YGM - higher pressure rate, better win rate, better run defender. 
For those PFF people, higher overall grade. 

so yeah…. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Well the hype was generational pass rusher.  Like hall of fame level player.  He's not that good but he is a good edge.

I never saw a cooler play than in that bowl game. He never really lived up to that but hey, still makes some plays.

He was like, ‘nah fug y’all we win’ end of story.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Theres way more generational prospects than there are generational players.

A generational player does not come around every year. They come around once in a decade, maybe two decades.  So I do not agree about generational prospects. You cannot predict them, they rise to the top when the games are played. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and he succeeded at an even higher level in LA with an even better surrounding cast. Goff is a guy that isn't really able to dramatically elevate players around him but he can make a good situation even better. He is capable of that. Some QB's aren't. I am not sure Dak is able to do that and he is in a similar "class" as Goff, IMO.
    • i think i could handle that for a year. beyond that....i don't know.  back where we lived, when we had a few inches of snow, it might have been a couple feet because we weren't getting out and doing anything. i remember times where power would go out for days on end. we had propane and electric heat, depending on the floor. basement (had a couple bedrooms and a living room and kitchen down there) and main floor had gas logs. main floor gas logs was enough to take care of the upstairs, so we could stay warm and cook on the grill when we needed. we had a well so that was always an issue when the power went out. had to make sure tubs were filled with water for the toilets and we had gallons of water for drinking and cooking available. always had to make sure we were ready. that wasn't always the case. we had a couple moments where we were going through propane quickly and because we were dealing with the worst propane company in the world (amerigas) they wouldn't get out to put gas in our 900 gallon tank. made for some nerve racking moments.  i know y'all were probably a lot more able to handle that kind of thing, but after the little bit (comparatively) that we got here i just have no desire to get trapped again. maybe for a day or two a year get snowed in and i'm good.
    • I think he is just drawing a DC to them line and that's about as far as his thought process went. It makes almost no sense outside of that. Also, it doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh or Seattle at this juncture either.  I think our "veteran" pool is basically gonna be the Dalton/Flacco tier or the "pick your poison" options of young busts(Jones/Z. Wilson) or wild, TO prone gunslingers(Darnold/Winston/etc). We have the option to pursue I genuinely believe(depending on the way the rest of this season goes), we either draft a QB in the top 10 or resign Dalton. Outlier third option on taking one of the wild gunslingers that Dave feels like he can work with.
×
×
  • Create New...