Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you think we will put on Fitzgerald, Gamble or Lucas?


Malt Liquor

Recommended Posts

gamble, with harris or godfrey helping out over the top .. you gotta be physical with the big guy

boldin will play i think, but that hammy has to hurt - he warrants single coverage

breaston, when in as the 3WR will probably belong to marshall for the most part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what side he lines up on, we don't flop our corners Lucas plays right Gamble plays left.

this is correct! and just to elaborate fitz typically plays mostly on gambles side of the field with boldin on the opposite but if they do move him around well then lucas or marshalls gonna have to step up.

btw I expect Lucas to step his game up now, he;s had the bye week and plenty of time to get his act together..part of his biggest problem is hes been getting picked on cuz nobdoy wants to throw to gambles side..i'm sure he needed the rest, now hopefully he can prove me right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what side he lines up on, we don't flop our corners Lucas plays right Gamble plays left.
This guy is exactly correct, our corners don't flip sides (they have learned to play a certain side of the field - out of bounds always the same for them.) So it will depend on where Fitz lines up. I would guess he lines up on the side of Lucas most though, they know we don't flip sides.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone keeps talking about blitzes. That is apparently the worst thing to do to Warner as he has a very quick release and the experience to know who to throw to in those situations. Couple that with standing off the WR (understandable against these type of receivers) and we really will struggle to get to him often. IMO we have to generate pressure with just our front four, the moment we start sending more guys consistently is the moment that we give up big plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...