Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst divisional matchup in primetime?


GRWatcher

Recommended Posts

I could freakin' care less whether the rest of the country thinks this is a sexy game. Their opinions are as relevant to me as the Saints or their fans.

They can all turn off the tube for all I care. My ass will be at the game screaming like a madman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of my buds thinks it is a good slot. Up here in canada with the CFL, they (fans) love to see the ball get air'd out. They know that arizona does that. And the Panthers have the capability to do so. Some of my friends (whom are pats fans) are pulling for the panthers. They Hate i mean hate running the ball. They say its so boring. But they don't mind that the panthers do so much because of their backs. I'm loving the primetime slot and all the fans jumping on the wagan up her in the north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see you do this, as the NFL hasn't agreed to keep the current schedule format beyond the 2009 season, and could possibly be adding a 17th (or 18th?!??!) game to the season (pulling one of the pre-season games).

We just gotta wait for the post-season owners' meeting to see what the vote is.

oh yeah, completely forgot they were talking about adding a game or two.

you are right, that will screw up the nice little even "power of two" system they have going on with 32 teams. my guess is that the current system has been working so well since 2001, they will make that extra game against a non-conference opponent that's not in the division you're on rotation with. that would be a fairly minor change and extend it to 3 games that are determined by previous season's performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could freakin' care less whether the rest of the country thinks this is a sexy game. Their opinions are as relevant to me as the Saints or their fans.

They can all turn off the tube for all I care. My ass will be at the game screaming like a madman.

Amen bro! :iagree: :party:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...