Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cats' MOD Change?


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

I know KT is the Mod, but I feel like someone else should take his place.

I have been following the Cats forum for quite some time, and now it seems every single thread is all about race. I am sick of it, honestly, the Cats are on the verge of getting somewhere they have never been, and I want to talk about that. It seems threads get off topic, because KT begins accusing people of being racist, and that rowdys everyone up! He should post his thoughts in Smack (or Tinderbox), where it belongs.

Secondly, there was a name change thread, that aside from it getting off track (racism), its overall message was interesting....changing the Bobcats name. I still feel this is a great topic, however, I can post on that thread because its LOCKED! (and future threads get locked/deleted) To me, it seems KT's motives do not seem to support the greater good of the Cats....

Is it just me, or am I the only one?

So I am posing this question....

Is it possible that we vote King Taharga out as the MOD?

My replacement vote would be RadioKiller, because he seems to be unbiased, and supports the Cats.:smash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Secondly, there was a name change thread, that aside from it getting off track (racism), its overall message was interesting....changing the Bobcats name. I still feel this is a great topic, however, I can post on that thread because its LOCKED! (and future threads get locked/deleted) To me, it seems KT's motives do not seem to support the greater good of the Cats....

Is it just me, or am I the only one?

The name change thread was locked because it basically just became a "spam" thread for the Charlotte Observer. I advised posters to just create a new thread anytime a new article appears. No one's done it yet, but you're more than welcome next time the Observer creates a new "name change" article. I scour the internet hours upon hours everyday looking for articles about the Bobcats and yet the only place a "name change" was discussed was on the Observer's website to draw blog hits to it. I felt at the time the CHARLOTTE BOBCATS were in the middle of a playoff run was not the appropriate time to contemplate erasing the legacy the team has been trying to build. Its still discussed over there on their forum if you want to discuss it. And racism is very much apart of the "name change" discussion whether you want to admit it or not.

You do realize without me bitching to Zod 5 years ago, there's a great chance this forum wouldnt even be in here? Yet because I go at the Charlotte Observer and voice the concerns of Bobcats fans Im no longer capable of being a mod? In 5 years in this forum I have closed 2 threads, 1 being the "name change" thread, the other the "ex-bobcats" thread which I quickly re-opened in moved to the Tinderbox. Compared to the other mods on this board the past 5 years, thats light duty. And no matter how passionately I objected to someone on this forum Ive never had them banned or even asked for them to banned. While I welcome anyone to support your movement if they feel the need, I challenge anyone on this board to name a poster who's contributed more to this forum than me.

So once again, the Charlotte mentality, if we dont like what you're saying we want to "vote you out" or "ban" you. I think thats why so much animosity over Bob Johnson, there was no one to "vote him out" or tell him "no you cant do that" and its built up resentment. If I had to black out Jerry Richardson to root for the Panthers, I would feel very conflicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And racism is very much apart of the "name change" discussion whether you want to admit it or not.

BS!! People want the name change because it a terrible name for a team & the fact it was named after BJ's first name. Racism has nothing to do with wanting name change. They just want a better name that isn't named after an owner. You won't admit that instead. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...