Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl.com win projections based on schedule. Vegas odds lol


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm still traumatized by how confident the organization and much of the fanbase was last year after we looked like the hottest of trash in the preseason. I was roundly mocked on here for expressing concern and condescendingly lectured about how real fans understand that preseason doesn't matter and we're gonna start kicking ass when we're actually game planning. I was like... okay, we'll see. Well, we saw.

And you were painfully correct.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Def taking the under. I see 1 or 2 wins and another #1 overall pick. Let’s hope a QB really impresses in college this season. Will be focused on Ewers.

Even before the schedule, I think top 5 seemed like a very good bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Even before the schedule, I think top 5 seemed like a very good bet.

Our new coach has already publicly said that Bryce is basically a game manager at best with the 1 of 11 stuff. The writing is already on the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't know. New coach, new system, new management, new weapons, excellent draft, great free agency pick ups. I mean, that's gotta create optimism, right?

Except we've heard this before. Like three times in the past six seasons. 

I hope Canales has the answer, but they're going to have to make me believe this time. Show me something. Anything.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was waffling on 5 or 6 wins before I opened this thread.  Funny the odds are 5.5 wins.  I said 6 in the prediction thread, but there's NO WAY I'm comfortable with that number; certainly not enough to put money on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is a year to year league. You need to start forgetting about the poo show from last year and move forward. 5 1/2 sounds about right. The NFC South and NFC East are week. The Doom and Gloom of the todays Huddle are not realities of the todays NFL. Things change quickly, enjoy the ride.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panic said:

The NFL is a year to year league. You need to start forgetting about the poo show from last year and move forward. 5 1/2 sounds about right. The NFC South and NFC East are week. The Doom and Gloom of the todays Huddle are not realities of the todays NFL. Things change quickly, enjoy the ride.

People don’t realize how much roster turn over happens across the league. Can’t remember who posted it on Twitter but the nfl averages 47% of new players on a roster for every team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Under all day. AFC West and NFC East??? Ouch.

Honestly, AFC West isn't particularly great outside of KC. And Washington and NYG aren't very good either...

That being said, we will probably still lose most, if not all, of those games because we suck

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mc52beast said:

How do we play those divisions and our schedule is third easiest? Guess because we’re in the South.

Indeed. You always have to take those "easiest" and "hardest" tags with a significant grain of salt in the preseason. 17 games will tell the story of who is actually an easy or difficult opponent 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...