Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs rangers rd 2 game 3. 7pm


Recommended Posts

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Added Guentzel, Kuznetsov, Svechnikov (injured last year), and Orlov to help us get over the hump… but we are on our way to getting swept again

Hope we can keep some of these guys for the new regime, if Dundon pulls the trigger after this debacle is officially over 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

Canes have 124 shots on goal with 7 goals so far in this series 

That’s because their shots are really just lobs right to the goalie’s pads. They aren’t actual scoring chances.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DamnItJake! said:

Where’s everyone to get the Lise puck!?? Just skating around!! 

At times we haven’t fought for pucks we normally do. In the 2nd Necas just stood and waited for Rangers to take possession. Burns the same once. We were the closest to the puck and let the rangers regain possession rather than fight.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Added Guentzel, Kuznetsov, Svechnikov (injured last year), and Orlov to help us get over the hump… but we are on our way to getting swept again.

Eventually it’s not the players, it’s the system.

Rangers are a step above it’s obvious!! They’re goalie is their positive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah my crazy theory is Canales, Morgan, and Tillis watched the film and read the locker room.  They saw a team giving up on a player and frustrated with his production.  Seems like a pretty easy decision from there...
    • We'll probably still lose, but I believe we'll be more competitive. I don't think signing another vet QB is wise considering we already have one. I think we should trade for a young QB sitting on the bench. I'm bias, but I would like for us to consider Rattler. Carr is doing very well with the Saints so he may be their starter for a while, so they may be more willing to trade Rattler. I'm not too impressed with the QB draft class for next year. I would rather trade back our 1st round pick for more picks and go BPA. Continue with the rebuilding process, and if Rattler or whoever doesn't cut it, then hopefully Manning will be the guy in 2026. And Tepper has to back off with any decision making. 
    • I said in another thread, I can’t find a glaring liability on offense. If Dalton can drop some 25+ yard dimes, we have some dudes that can make hay. Picks be damned. I’ll take a 2 or 3 pick day for 35 points on the board. We just need something. A spark. Anything.  We won’t be good, but it has potential to be fun to watch, and the tone in the stadium… hope. 
×
×
  • Create New...