Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hockey Bets


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

True, and I believe Connor Mcdavid already sat the last game...

I want to get the Sabres in some parlays on the moneyline of +130 before the line starts to move because I assume no vassi 

Vas is playing tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

With korpisalo?

They are starting Igor again instead of Quick. Knowing they get a break they are playing their playoff starter again. When in reality Quick is more than capable of handling the senators. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

You really think the redwings, oilers and kings will all win by exactly 2?

The most common winning margins in hockey are 1 and 2, I don't fully expect them too no but with the fact nhl teams pull there goalies when down 1 or 2 makes the actual chances much better and if the earlier games and picks hit they will also start offering cashout real early given the winning amount, say the the first three early ones hit they will probably offer a 20k cashout or more.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Redwings and kings I could get behind. Oilers are gonna kill the sharks even if they are resting everyone. 

The Sharks are actually 1-1 in their season series with the sharks, and I have to say I've watched the last 4 sharks games betting agaist them and they have played much better than I expected and even killed a bet of mine by beating the Kraken. With the Oilers resting I think it stays a 2-3 goal loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

The most common winning margins in hockey are 1 and 2, I don't fully expect them too no but with the fact nhl teams pull there goalies when down 1 or 2 makes the actual chances much better and if the earlier games and picks hit they will also start offering cashout real early given the winning amount, say the the first three early ones hit they will probably offer a 20k cashout or more.

Welp here goes nothing! Might do one with Edmonton total over and spread over too. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Welp here goes nothing! Might do one with Edmonton total over and spread over too. 

I might make a duplicate of the same! I have a feeling the other two will be closer games and the empty net will get them to 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...