Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales on fixing Bryce's footwork


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

We work on the footwork regardless of who the qb is, every year at the beginning of camp.

Tom Brady, I know you are the greatest of all time, but we are going to start this years camp by working on your footwork.  lol

 

I do hope he can turn the kid into a good qb.  

I dont thats bs though.  Even with Brady start training camp focusing on the basics and fly through them as fast as it was unnecessary.   You spend as little or as much time as needed on it.  Doesnt mean you wouldnt start there with everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CmC2k said:

I think the coming to Jesus moment for last year's staff was in the Jets joint practices when they saw first-hand just how bad the Oline was in this scheme where they couldn't just line up and power run the football like they were doing under Wilks. Getting destroyed like they did probably took every pass concept that was more than 20 yards out of the play book because we simply couldn't hold up in pass pro for that long. 

They never intended to be a power rushing scheme. Reich has always run a zone blocking scheme. 

The fact that he didn't have the OLine to implement it is just another layer to the madness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Why are we teaching the #1 overall pick, who's had a QB coach since he was big enough to hold a football with one hand, the very basics of throwing?

Because he may not have had coaching from professional coaches? i don't know and i don't know how rudimentary the teaching is, but i do know that it's open to interpretation based on what canales is saying and it's very easy to make the jump to he's having to be retaught everything from the very start for someone who thinks he's a garbage QB anyways. 

every QB can be and should be taught and retaught some fundamentals from time to time to get them back on track when some bad habits have formed over time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Because he may not have had coaching from professional coaches? i don't know and i don't know how rudimentary the teaching is, but i do know that it's open to interpretation based on what canales is saying and it's very easy to make the jump to he's having to be retaught everything from the very start for someone who thinks he's a garbage QB anyways. 

every QB can be and should be taught and retaught some fundamentals from time to time to get them back on track when some bad habits have formed over time.  

Yeah Canales mentioned they work on footwork every year with every QB. Hell Cam never really got his footwork right, his arm strength could hide his sometimes sloppy footwork. It also caused his to overthrow a lot of passes and be kind of “streaky” with it.  Throw in a bad OL and footwork will usually get sloppy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Yeah Canales mentioned they work on footwork every year with every QB. Hell Cam never really got his footwork right, his arm strength could hide his sometimes sloppy footwork. It also caused his to overthrow a lot of passes and be kind of “streaky” with it.  Throw in a bad OL and footwork will usually get sloppy. 

they all come to the league needing some work. it's not a bad thing to recognize that and have to address it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:
Everyone had an opinion on how to get Young and the offense untracked. Some in the organization believed Young wasn’t getting deep enough on his dropbacks, causing some of the pass protection issues that resulted in a mind-boggling 62 sacks.
Canales said Young’s drops played “a little bit” of a role in the protection woes.

Oh jeebus, PR show in full effect.  He isn't a nice and mild as he seems....you might not believe it but....wait for it.....he got some dawg in him lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Consensus #1 overall pick needs all-star supporting cast to succeed. More news at 11.

Only people I've ever seen argue this is those that constantly cry about Young.

31 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Why are we teaching the #1 overall pick, who's had a QB coach since he was big enough to hold a football with one hand, the very basics of throwing?

Some of you acting like this is a big deal now are the same ones that cried about Ron and Co never holding Newton accountable to improve his footwork. Funny how the argument shifts to support your narrative.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Only people I've ever seen argue this is those that constantly cry about Young.

Some of you acting like this is a big deal now are the same ones that cried about Ron and Co never holding Newton accountable to improve his footwork. Funny how the argument shifts to support your narrative.

Mahomes, Allen, and tons of players have bad footwork.  Footwork is a topic on conversation only when the results are bad.  I mean, in theory the best QB in the NFL.....is basically a textbook of what you don't want your QB to be and do.  The results simply aren't what the textbook says should happen when you play like Mahomes does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, frankw said:

TE is a wasteland. I like Tremble's potential with Canales but holy poo how many regime changes is Ian Thomas going to survive.

I'm not sure any TE has ever gotten more bang for the buck for his bank account as Ian Thomas has. He's the type of guy who should've been bouncing around the league trying to latch onto a roster as the 3rd TE and yet we've made him a wealthy man. Good for him but holy poo we're a dumb organization.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ECHornet said:

You’d rather him tell everyone which route concepts they’re going to emphasize?

This is completely irrelevant and not material. 

His line is they're going to have to throw a bunch at him to see what sticks, implying that after a year of tape they can't say with certainty if he has any strengths. Talking about how he plants his back foot is literally talking about what throws he can comfortably make. 

None of this is "route concepts" or whatever. They're literally working just the tree. 

After one year in the NFL, the panthers head coach is saying they don't know which of the basic throws their QB can make. 

This is not complicated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Oh jeebus, PR show in full effect.  He isn't a nice and mild as he seems....you might not believe it but....wait for it.....he got some dawg in him lol. 

I remember him getting fired up on the sidelines one game.  Also wasn't there some speech he gave the locker room?  I don't think you can make it to this level and not have some passion/competitiveness unless you are just some insane athlete like a Peppers or Clowney.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Mahomes, Allen, and tons of players have bad footwork.  Footwork is a topic on conversation only when the results are bad.  I mean, in theory the best QB in the NFL.....is basically a textbook of what you don't want your QB to be and do.  The results simply aren't what the textbook says should happen when you play like Mahomes does. 

Mahomes is also that ultra rare true generational type player. Holding him up as an example to either side really doesn't work because he is that 1 in a million or whatever number you want to use. That said, I agree with you that most people, including coaches, don't give a poo about footwork until the results are bad. But there are also those that use the argument simply because they don't like the QB for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...