Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs leafs 7pm

Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

Beat Toronto earlier this year 3-2, scored a PP goal and had a 100% PK.

Carolina allowed 2 goals on 28 shots, if I remember.

Samsonov a lot like the last 2 goalies Carolina faced in Shesterkin and Bobo- big guys who can be beat high glove. But the Necas goal was low blocker/far post and Kuznetsov looked like he tee'd it up and took enough time to tell Bobo, "Go ahead and get set, I'll blow this one by you regardless;" and went low blocker.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Beat Toronto earlier this year 3-2, scored a PP goal and had a 100% PK.

Carolina allowed 2 goals on 28 shots, if I remember.

Pyotr, who I expect will be in goal tonight, had 25 saves on 27 shots. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaWillRise Proficient

CarolinaWillRise

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Beat Toronto earlier this year 3-2, scored a PP goal and had a 100% PK.

Carolina allowed 2 goals on 28 shots, if I remember.

Samsonov a lot like the last 2 goalies Carolina faced in Shesterkin and Bobo- big guys who can be beat high glove. But the Necas goal was low blocker/far post and Kuznetsov looked like he tee'd it up and took enough time to tell Bobo, "Go ahead and get set, I'll blow this one by you regardless;" and went low blocker.

Kuzy has ice water in his veins some if he gets the puck and time in front of the goalie he's fine with a stare down....

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)

Per Walt it’s a UBI and Lemieux will draw in instead with Fast heading to the Aho line in line rushes…
 

I’d prefer Jarvis move to Aho and Fast get some time on the MSF line though. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted (edited)

The times RBA has moved Fast to the top line has been against more physical teams and was a little surprised he didn't do it against Florida the other night. Regardless, that top line better produce tonight, because the Guentzel/Necas/Kuz line looks like they can do some serious damage, and they're still working on "chemistry," lol...

 

Edited by Anybodyhome
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaWillRise Proficient

CarolinaWillRise

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

The times RBA has moved Fast to the top line has been against more physical teams and was a little surprised he didn't do it against Florida the other night. Regardless, that top line better produce tonight, because the Guentzel/Necas/Kuz line looks like they can do some serious damage, and they're still working on "chemistry," lol...

 

The Leafs aren't exactly all that physical nice having an Lemieux in to go with Reaves if needed though

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...