Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Also if Tripp said power play or Shane said they will get rewarded one more time I was gonna flip my poo. 
 

Their player was literally laying on the puck and then tried to paw it back tripped Skjei and then held his stick. I think it was fuging Fox. I’m not sure. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

I think when Guetzal and Kuzenetzov gets used to everyone , they will be major contributors 

Also cheers to Kooch , kept us in inspite of terrible turnovers 

We got to find a way to get past these strong defensive teams, like Vegas who made Bob and upchuck look mediocre 

Jam 2nd we beat the rags in the Garden 6-1 with Shesterkin in net so it can be done. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Gonna take some games. Plus, those two played awesome. Those goals will come. 

Well obviously it was tongue in cheek but not from the broadcast. 
 

KK line > Aho > Kuz > Staal for overall offensive play and general play. Fast needs to go back on the Staal line for games like this, he was real Fast today and probably our best forward on the ice overall. 
 

Rod needs to put Gunz and Kuz on different lines for now too. Give them time to adjust. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Jarvis

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Fast

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Jarvis

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

This is exactly how I would have our lines, only one cavit swap Jarvis and Fast, 

Jarvis was actually scoring far more with Noesen-KK-Jarvis (they were our second line for like 2 months) just have the Martinook-Staal-Jarvis line as the cloud

Checkers avaim.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s a nice night! How much did you wager on your parlay?

Zero in cash haha they are handing tons of house cash bets right now, I cashed it out like four minutes later in a panic lol pardon 11 leg bet I got 9 right in a row before the thunder sh*t the bed I'm not a basketball guy I based it all off advanced metrics and a bit of gut instict.

 

1532791809_Screenshot_20240312_215223_FanDuelSportsbook.thumb.jpg.c5fdb8e33ca5de79710686d20c074a16.jpg

Edited by CarolinaWillRise
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I personally feel like the Kuznetsov line needs a stronger forechecking presence.

I originally was against a Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas line but I think I might be for it.

Guentzel - Aho - Teravainen

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Jarvis

Noesen - Kotkaniemi - Fast

Drury, Lemiuex

And if you want to give the first line an additional forechecker then swap Teravainen and Jarvis.

I’d go 

Gunz - Aho - TT

Svech - Kuz - Jarvis

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Drury/KK - Necas

In a game like this the Staal line needs Fast. I hate to say it, Jarvis did jack poo tonight. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Richard Sherman got dog piled for basically saying he didn't stand out as a WR prospect but looked elite as a CB prospect. A few months ago you could find other players commenting on his limited route tree and raw route running but the search algorithms are flooded with love affair right now. The guy is the best CB prospect in years and he'll contribute on offense too. That is the absolute opposite of a knock on the guy. It's just the people buying into him being a full time two way player in the NFL like he was at Colorado who gets their panties in a wad over just stating the simple reality that he ain't gonna be a full time two way player at the NFL level with 17 games seasons and no Travis Hunter fan should want that either if you want the guy to make it to a second contract.
    • You do know you have to be invited to College GameDay? They called him out there and asked him about it and he answered it. And do you think he would have this type of interactions with a coach he doesn't have that type of relationship with? You're reaching to the furthest extent lol. I've seen a video of Hunter literally getting cursed out by Shedeur by not catching a BAD pass from Sanders and he didn't say anything just went out and caught a TD pass the next play! A "diva" would've got into a shouting match with his QB 
    • WHAT?!?!?!?! Honestly for the life of me, I can't figure out what you're saying here.  How are you saying their supporting casts cancel each other out and Hunter STILL had the better season? The supporting cast is LITERALLY the reason that he had the better season statistically.  If you put T-Mac on Colorado in place of Hunter, I'm 100% convinced he'd have had better stats than Hunter did, as he already had almost the same number of catches, and more yards, with a significantly worse QB and with zero other offensive weapons to take any attention away from him like Hunter had. If you think Hunter having 7 more TDs is more because of Hunter vs T-Mac and not because Hunter's QB had literally DOUBLE the number of TD's this year than T-Mac's QB, then I have some Arizona oceanfront property to sell you.
×
×
  • Create New...