Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Thomas getting Restructure


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

How does this guy keep surviving multiple regime changes?? Hes gotta have some dirt on Tepper lol

There's no other fuggin way. We can release solid depth on the o-line (Bozeman) but can't do away with a dude that has 4 TDs through SIX seasons?!

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

Yup. Guessing Ian chose the pay cut over finding out if anyone else would give him more than vet min in FA.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

is he taking a cut or renegotiating the terms moving money to the back end? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

cut bozeman but keep thomas

 

Way too early to grade morgan but damn..........

I love the no BS attitude he's taking towards these underachieving players.  It's refreshing for a Panthers GM to hold them accountable.  It's the back fill I'm concerned about and how it's going to be a near impossible task.  The reason I feel more and more that this will be a full rebuild (see tank) season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m going with Nick Emmanwori as the pick right now. Charlie Campbell has him ranked 5th on his post combine big board and another safety is needed.
    • That is ridiculous on several levels. First of all you have to spend 90% of your cap space every year so the idea you can just not spend it every year is against the CBA. Secondly your job is to assemble the best team you can for the fans players and team. Not to save money for the owner.  Third many players who are considered great underperform while others like Luvu and Jackson have overperformed. What about a  great player like Derek Brown who was injured and missed all of last year. Was he a waste of money?? Sure pay DK a fools ransom and hope he stays healthy. He didn't even get 1000 yards last year which averages out to 60 yards a game or play all 16 games.  And lets be real, Jones and Watson aren't  great but they aren't being paid that much either. Real glad you aren't the GM.
    • Not necessarily, they very well could just be waiting on the players who will get cut in the coming weeks/months as cap casualties and wanting to have the cap room to be able to offer more than other teams (likely our best shot at finding immediate pass rushing help for next year at this point). Also wouldn't be the end of the world to try and roll some cap into next offseason to have more space to go after bigger FA's. That's a better move than signing guys who really won't help much more than whoever else we can get on minimum or rookie deals.
×
×
  • Create New...