Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Canes Acquire Jake Guentzel

MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Hahahahahahahah. No way dude!   We owned this trade. We haven’t had a 100 point guy since 2006 Eric Staal. We just got one.  Time to ride! 

And what happened to the canes after 2006? 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Guentzel is not a 100 point player. I don’t even think he’s an 80 point player on the Canes. Probably 60’s-70’s. And we never see that if he doesn’t re-sign.

We could enjoy Morrow 5 years form now when our big guns are gone and the window is closed and we all will be sitting here pissed off we missed our window to win the cup. 
 

…or they finally nutted up and made a move  for that guy. GUEZ is him. I love it.  
 

this fanbase is so brainwashed to hold on to prospects to hope for a maybe in the future. Zero cups under that philosophy and only one player that has even played for us in Drury. Y’all are wild man. We got the best player and you are complaining??!!   Jesus guys 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

We could enjoy Morrow 5 years form now when our big guns are gone and the window is closed and we all will be sitting here pissed off we missed our window to win the cup. 
 

…or they finally nutted up and made a move  for that guy. GUEZ is him. I love it.  
 

this fanbase is so brainwashed to hold on to prospects to hope for a maybe in the future. Zero cups under that philosophy and only one player that has even played for us in Drury. Y’all are wild man. We got the best player and you are complaining??!!   Jesus guys 

The goal is to keep the window open so you don’t end up like Pittsburgh and Washington. That’s why you hold on to prospects and only trade good one’s for players with term.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

WOW…

Pagnotta said Morrow was in the deal… Servalli is saying he is NOT.

I trust servalli over pagnotta this go round. He’s been more up on the deals quicker than pagnotta, but both are legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaWillRise Proficient

CarolinaWillRise

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

The goal is to keep the window open so you don’t end up like Pittsburgh and Washington. That’s why you hold on to prospects and only trade good one’s for players with term.

I'd be cool with ending up like Pittsburgh lol multiple cups....

Washington meh but still got a recentish cup so.....  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

The goal is to keep the window open so you don’t end up like Pittsburgh and Washington. That’s why you hold on to prospects and only trade good one’s for players with term.

The goal is to win the cup. That’s it. End of discussion.   This team has current talent to stay in the window. It doesn’t have the guy to win it all….until now. Stop kicking the damn can. Win it now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I trust servalli over pagnotta this go round. He’s been more up on the deals quicker than pagnotta, but both are legit. 

Yeah Servalli seems more careful with his words and has only spoken in absolutes when sure this time.

He said a trade call is being set up now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Guentzel is not a 100 point player. I don’t even think he’s an 80 point player on the Canes. Probably 60’s-70’s. And we never see that if he doesn’t re-sign.

He averages out to 58 points a season. So on the canes with our scheme he’s probably a 40 point guy not a “50” goal guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CarolinaWillRise said:

I'd be cool with ending up like Pittsburgh lol multiple cups....

Washington meh but still got a recentish cup so.....  

 

Elite players though, we have Aho and that’s it. I’m fine with selling off good prospects to get us over the hump, I personally don’t think Guentzel does but I hope I’m wrong.

I don’t see a team with Jack Drury as their 2C winning the Cup.

I truly think this team needs another elite center.

Petterson would have got us there.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...