Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns Franchise Tagged


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

July 15th....clock is ticking, Tilis. Let's get this done. First hurdle is the NFL Draft, so if 0 is still a Panther after the draft, I think a LT deal gets done between then and July. No way they let a $24M hit remain in a very important offseason where adding talent is needed.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39658435/panthers-franchise-tag-pass-rusher-brian-burns-source-says

"The Carolina Panthers on Monday placed the franchise tag on edge rusher Brian Burns that guarantees their sack leader $24 million this season, a source told ESPN"

"The goal remains to sign Burns to a long-term deal. Carolina also wants to re-sign free agent linebacker Frankie Luvu and sign defensive tackle Derrick Brown to a long-term deal."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK NFL Nerds with little to no lives:

What does this mean in relation to the possibility of trading Burns?   In other words, does this distinction provide an indication of what they intend to do?  It would seem to me that they might have better luck trading him after the draft--but I don't keep up with patterns, so I am curious. 

Now I have to get back to a fulfilling, very productive life.  Thanks in advance,

Love,

MHS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39658435/panthers-franchise-tag-pass-rusher-brian-burns-source-says

"The Carolina Panthers on Monday placed the franchise tag on edge rusher Brian Burns that guarantees their sack leader $24 million this season, a source told ESPN"

"The goal remains to sign Burns to a long-term deal. Carolina also wants to re-sign free agent linebacker Frankie Luvu and sign defensive tackle Derrick Brown to a long-term deal."

This tells me that nothing has changed with this team. I do not want to hear Dan Morgan mention the word Dawg again. He's full of poo.

  • Pie 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

OK NFL Nerds with little to no lives:

What does this mean in relation to the possibility of trading Burns?   In other words, does this distinction provide an indication of what they intend to do?  It would seem to me that they might have better luck trading him after the draft--but I don't keep up with patterns, so I am curious. 

Now I have to get back to a fulfilling, very productive life.  Thanks in advance,

Love,

MHS

Probably aren't trading him.

Unless we give him permission to talk to other teams about a contract extension (like Lamar Jackson last year), we are keeping him.

The time to trade him is either before the draft, during is unlikely, after is pointless.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

He can still be traded. Placing the non exclusive tag on him allows that 

"The team placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on outside linebacker Brian Burns"

--Panthers.com

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

This tells me that nothing has changed with this team. I do not want to hear Dan Morgan mention the word Dawg again. He's full of poo.

So you've given up on the idea that it's just GM-speak?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Best to see Icky in the position we drafted him in to see if he continues making progress. All signs point to Canales/Morgan staying on board and so decisions on whether to move him elsewhere on the line will probably be done during the offseason. Personally, I'm more concerned about a more long-term answer at safety and Moton's spot. Love the guy but he's a FA after 2026 and he'll be 32 by then. Kinda has that sign of having to let a player walk one year too early.
    • All I am saying is IMO if we were going to rework or extend his deal I think it would have happened by now.   Just feels like they are going to bite the bullet and let it run its course
    • I mean me speaking honestly per normal- RT is not even on my radar for needing fixing....it sorta should be, but I feel its around 20s in "hey this need attention". Motown could have another 5 years of solid play leftd in his body and mind. I know something needs to done with his contract, its had money pushed back into the late years like three times now. He got like a 38 million cap number cause rhule, frittterererer and this past season Dan deferred money.  I think he's been "healthy" for most of his career and seems to work hard at being able to play. He's a good player to have on the team. I got no idea how this plays out.   We need to have friendly bet about Christs next contract- I say he gets 8million per and 40% guaranteed. If he gets below that, you are the true kungfu master- deal? 
×
×
  • Create New...