Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Player safety rules.. Killing the game


Azteca

Recommended Posts

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=5005206

The difference would be that currently the protection provided for the defenseless receiver ends when the receiver has completed the catch, meaning possession of the ball with two feet on the ground

This would eliminate hits like the one Chris Harris delivered on that poor Jacksonville Jaguar a few years ago... I dont agree with this at all. They're also talking about moving Linemen from a 3 point to a 4 point stance in order to reduce the cumulitive affect that those head shots produce...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

psh, nice argument there by the article, "when the new rules for hitting the quarterback were implemented, the NFL prospered and was more exciting" (something along those lines) is freaking retarded. 10 qbs threw for 4000 yards and a dozen threw for 25 tds.... uhhh... thats only more exciting to people who masturbate to highlight reels all day. theres something called balance in football, and its being obliterated. i mean why don't we just start playing backyard football or arena football, where the scores are always 50/60+. way more exciting right bro. why dont we just get rid of offensive lines, and have a guy count out 5 mississippi till he can run in and two hand touch the quarterback.

and yes, players are bigger and faster nowadays, but look at how often career ending injuries occur compared to the old days. this is such a joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heres the rest of that quote the OP left out..

"We would propose language that would say that if a receiver has completed the catch and has not had time to protect himself, a defensive player is prohibited from launching into him in a way that causes the defensive player's helmet, face mask, shoulder or forearm to forcibly strike the receiver's head."

thought that was already a rule...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im so sick of these player safety rules now, I was watching an older niner/cowboy game on NFL netwrok the other day and it's like they didn't even exist. It really does seem like it will be flag football soon, and personally I think it's taking away from the sport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fine with bigger penalties for helmet to helmet hits, but this is kind of a joke..

the HILARIOUS(and hypocritical) part of this is Goodell is trying to put this rule in to prevent injuries, yet wants to extend the NFL regular season a couple games which would result in a lot more injuries than these.

Goodell is the worst NFL commish of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that people whine and cry about the added rules while seemingly not caring one ounce for the players and their families with what have been deemed to be be too serious hits. It's as if you view them as toys for your own amusement. Watch the NFL, then flip over to MMA to satisfy your need for brutalization. The NFL adds these rules for a reason.

That said, I'm going to UFC 114 in Vegas in May. Rashad versus Rampage!

Now...I'll wait while dozens of you quote this, argue in favor of the old NFL days, and insult me. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No this is just becoming complete BS the Godell is doing this now adays, The nfl was fine until he came along. Now he is trying to turn the nfl into a pu$$y league now. Ha the guys get paid millons every year. If they get hurt and half to retire. At least they are setup for life so long as the players don't spend all in one place. Roger is screwing the fans who watch the game. Some one needs to fire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that people whine and cry about the added rules while seemingly not caring one ounce for the players and their families with what have been deemed to be be too serious hits. It's as if you view them as toys for your own amusement. Watch the NFL, then flip over to MMA to satisfy your need for brutalization. The NFL adds these rules for a reason.

That said, I'm going to UFC 114 in Vegas in May. Rashad versus Rampage!

Now...I'll wait while dozens of you quote this, argue in favor of the old NFL days, and insult me. :wink:

Blah blah blah. These guys get paid millions of dollars a year and they got great health coverage. Most NFL fans work hard for a few bucks an hour just buy tickets just to see them play football and not a pu$$y contest. I'm for protecting players from head injuries and all. But the NFL is taking way to far and turnnign the NFL into a Pu$$y league. The more rules they change the more NFL loses fans. The more fans they loss the more money they loss. Injuries are of the game. It's just a like a factory worker going to work in a factory. The factory has rules to keep workers safe. But workers getting hurt is still a big risk no matter how many rules there are. These guys are rich. Getting injuried are retiring is not going to hurt their wallets any less.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was kind of hoping they'd wear these...A-Man-in-a-Chicken-Suit.jpg

but hey, what do i know? Goodell can die for all i care. and i mean that too. no regrets on that statement. the NFL has lost all meaning to the word "football." it's like telling hockey players they can't do body checks anymore. it's a contact sport. people are going to get hurt regardless. yeah, protect the head, but what good is a head when the rest of the body is paralyzed? i mean come on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a bunch of pussies, is all I can say. Now when I played football, back in the leather helmet days, we use to have brass knuckles on our hands to aid in, shall we say, getting to the qb. We can't trip anybody, we can't smack anybody, we can't launch ourselves into anybody, we can't even stand over someone and celebrate and now we can't pop the receiver while he is in the air. Just childs play now. We use to drink a bottle of draino before the game, just to sweeten our farts when we piled on. It's just not fun anymore, it's just not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and he succeeded at an even higher level in LA with an even better surrounding cast. Goff is a guy that isn't really able to dramatically elevate players around him but he can make a good situation even better. He is capable of that. Some QB's aren't. I am not sure Dak is able to do that and he is in a similar "class" as Goff, IMO.
    • i think i could handle that for a year. beyond that....i don't know.  back where we lived, when we had a few inches of snow, it might have been a couple feet because we weren't getting out and doing anything. i remember times where power would go out for days on end. we had propane and electric heat, depending on the floor. basement (had a couple bedrooms and a living room and kitchen down there) and main floor had gas logs. main floor gas logs was enough to take care of the upstairs, so we could stay warm and cook on the grill when we needed. we had a well so that was always an issue when the power went out. had to make sure tubs were filled with water for the toilets and we had gallons of water for drinking and cooking available. always had to make sure we were ready. that wasn't always the case. we had a couple moments where we were going through propane quickly and because we were dealing with the worst propane company in the world (amerigas) they wouldn't get out to put gas in our 900 gallon tank. made for some nerve racking moments.  i know y'all were probably a lot more able to handle that kind of thing, but after the little bit (comparatively) that we got here i just have no desire to get trapped again. maybe for a day or two a year get snowed in and i'm good.
    • I think he is just drawing a DC to them line and that's about as far as his thought process went. It makes almost no sense outside of that. Also, it doesn't make sense for Pittsburgh or Seattle at this juncture either.  I think our "veteran" pool is basically gonna be the Dalton/Flacco tier or the "pick your poison" options of young busts(Jones/Z. Wilson) or wild, TO prone gunslingers(Darnold/Winston/etc). We have the option to pursue I genuinely believe(depending on the way the rest of this season goes), we either draft a QB in the top 10 or resign Dalton. Outlier third option on taking one of the wild gunslingers that Dave feels like he can work with.
×
×
  • Create New...