Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yasinskas thinks one "starter" needed at DT


ncbobcat

Recommended Posts

In Pat's NFCS mailbag, a question was written about DTs on current roster and whether they are starting quality or not. I feel the same way Pat does:

Al in Washington, DC writes: I'm intrigued by your take on the Panthers' DTs. I feel good about a starting rotation of Louis Leonard, Tank Tyler, and Ed Johnson. Corvey Irvin is a project with a lot of upside, which would give us 4 guys. Ron Meeks likes to move DTs inside anyway, and Tyler Brayton and Charles Johnson can handle that. Granted, I wouldn't like to see Nick Hayden and Derek Landri pressed into significant service at this point, but I won't be upset if this is our opening day roster. Am I putting too much faith in those first three, or undervaluing experienced depth?

Pat Yasinskas: In my opinion, Leonard, Tyler and Johnson aren’t guys I’d want to count on as the definitive starters. Yes, they have some good qualities. But the John Fox defense always has been built around the defensive line. Right now, the Panthers have “just guys’’ at defensive tackle. I think they need to add one quality defensive tackle.

Comfortable at DT or one solid starter definitely needed?

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/9004/nfc-south-mailbag-15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am siding with Al in Washington. If i have to choose between a DT or WR in the 2nd i pick WR. Smith and Matt Moore need help. We all seem to forget that Moore is pretty close to a rookie. What pieces do teams always try to give a young QB?

1. Run game- In spades

2. number 1 WR- Check

3. Oline- Check

4. TE's- Check

5. Reliable 2nd and 3rd option at WR- Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on the need for a WR to compliment Smitty, BUT we are looking for a starter at DT and not (in a famous line by Moose) a "decoy" for Smitty. I think we can get a good pick up in the 3rd round for a solid #2 WR. I don't think we get a starting quality DT in in round three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I think that DT is a bigger need than DE right now.

With Brayton back I am less worried about DE. Until he re-signed, I was uneasy about that position too. Right now, I think most agree that DT and WR should go in rounds two and three, it's just the order that is being disputed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh.. the guys we cut were 'just guys' if that's what he is getting at. I definitely agree that we need to get a DT.

I would even go as far to say that trading next years 1st&4th to pick up a DT in early 2nd if one were to drop further than he's supposed to(such as Brian Price, man that'd be awesome) would be a smart idea.

When it comes down to it though, WR is a bigger need because frankly, WE HAVE NO ONE. At least at DT we have some guys with potential. At WR we have Smitty and.......... Jarrett as our #2.. yeeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhhh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as value goes, is there a huge differece between the WRs slated to go in the second and third rounds? I don't think so, but DT has more value in the second than the third, IMO.

In other words, apples to apples, I think the best DT left on the board at our selection in the second holds greater value than the top WR left at the same pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to figure out what "starter" you guys are thinking will be there in the mid 2nd at DT. SUH, MCCOY, WILLIAMS, PRICE and ODRICK are going 1st round IMO. CODY and CAM THOMAS will be gotten by teams reaching for a NT. ( Bills and Chiefs) Really the only talent i see there to choose from is Tyson Alualu and Lamar Houston. Maybe a reach for Geno Atkins. At WR i could easily see Taylor Price, Demaryuis Thomas, Carlton Mitchell, Mardy Gilyard, Jordan Shipley, and Andre Roberts there when we pick. I don't see the value. In case all of you have not noticed with the rule changes that protect the QB and tie the hands of Cornerbacks the passing game is a bigger part of the game than ever. If you think Jarrett, Smith and whoever is left after 64 picks have been made with only 12 WR prospects with first three round value is good enough in today's NFL fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see us get Hollis Thomas back or a player that can play nose tackle. I have enough faith in our scouts and coaches that the current defensive tackles we have now will get the job done. Last year we played well without Kemo and Lewis was no big star in my eyes so I don't know why he thinks we need a starter at DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we did pretty well with stop gap guys at DT/NT the last half of the season.

while i would like to have brian price i think we could do alright filling in with stop gap rotational guys.

they do so much scheme changes i don't see it as a huge priority to get a "starter". there will be plenty to choose from through the offseason. price would be more of a BPA acquisition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see us get Hollis Thomas back or a player that can play nose tackle. I have enough faith in our scouts and coaches that the current defensive tackles we have now will get the job done. Last year we played well without Kemo and Lewis was no big star in my eyes so I don't know why he thinks we need a starter at DT.

I'm not sure about "well", but they did the job adequately enough and the guy that plugged the massive leak in the dam...big Hollis as you mentioned, will not be back.

Without Peppers getting double teamed and Thomas plugging the "A" gaps, I'm not sure how "well" these guys will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to figure out what "starter" you guys are thinking will be there in the mid 2nd at DT. SUH, MCCOY, WILLIAMS, PRICE and ODRICK are going 1st round IMO. CODY and CAM THOMAS will be gotten by teams reaching for a NT. ( Bills and Chiefs) Really the only talent i see there to choose from is Tyson Alualu and Lamar Houston. Maybe a reach for Geno Atkins. At WR i could easily see Taylor Price, Demaryuis Thomas, Carlton Mitchell, Mardy Gilyard, Jordan Shipley, and Andre Roberts there when we pick. I don't see the value. In case all of you have not noticed with the rule changes that protect the QB and tie the hands of Cornerbacks the passing game is a bigger part of the game than ever. If you think Jarrett, Smith and whoever is left after 64 picks have been made with only 12 WR prospects with first three round value is good enough in today's NFL fine.

Exactly! If there is a run on DTs that's exactly why we have to get one in the second because by the third the pickings will be slim. On the other hand, I can't remember there being huge runs on WRs once the top dogs are off the board in the first. Some of those WRs will be there in the third. Shipley definitely will, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tua has maybe 2 passes further than 5 yards. 
    • I'd give the rookie WR's more credit than that. Bryce did actually earn most his yards against the Chiefs, but that Saints game was all rookie WR's yac. It was probably like 80ish of the 170 total passing yards were yac by JT and Coker. The throws have been accurate though and he's obviously playing with more confidence. I still want to see something over 40 yards in the air at some point that looks good/accurate
    • We’ll agree to disagree.  Maybe change my wording to better roster would have been more accurate. Gamecocks have some nice defensive players….but they are also thinner than Clemson all around.  it’s at Clemson.  Dabo.  Better overall roster.  And they are favored slightly….which essentially supports my prior post that either could win but if you had to pick without a dog in the race Clemson is the smarter pick.   straight up vs Carolina? I trust Clemson’s O more than Carolina’s.    Top 10 vs top 60 with the QB edge.  And Clemson’s D has some real studs on it too.   Which is what Vegas says.   I’ll make my pick game day.  Will depend on who can and can’t suit up for Clemson.  Carolina has been much healthier this year.  But ST could be the difference.  That Louisville game exposed some massive flaws in their kick game.  You don’t really want ST weakness showing itself vs Beamer 
×
×
  • Create New...