Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible 3 way trade for McNabb(Seahawks, Saints, Eagles)


Swarly

Recommended Posts

Seattle gets Reggie Bush & #32 from New Orleans

New Orleans gets Julius Jones & #14 from Seattle

Philadelphia gets #32 from Seattle

Seattle gets Donovan McNabb

__

apparently this was said on ESPN radio. it's just a RUMOR but interesting nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen.

The thing that makes it unrealistic in my opinion is Saints getting a #14 overall pick for Reggie Bush lol.

edit- actually after that AWFUL trade Seattle made for Whitehurst, I can actually see it happening loool

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle gets Reggie Bush & #32 from New Orleans

New Orleans gets Julius Jones & #14 from Seattle

Philadelphia gets #32 from Seattle

Seattle gets Donovan McNabb

__

apparently this was said on ESPN radio. it's just a RUMOR but interesting nonetheless.

The Saints love Reggie. They have done nothing to give anyone the impression that he is going anywhere.

And for all the hate he gets on this board, he averaged a whopping 5.6/carry and scored 8 TDs in the regular season last year. And he is a great receiver out of the backfield. And he scored 3 TDs in the playoffs. And he is Sean Payton's first pick ever, and Payton wants him to succeed.

So while he is never going to win a popularity contest on the Huddle, he is a very good player that the Saints find pretty valuable, and he is not going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints would be trading Bush + a #32 overall for the #14 overall and Julius Jones.. I don't think the Saints are getting a bargain.. they must really have their eye on someone to move up the draft like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an Eagles fan, I don't think the #32 for Mcnabb is bad at all and wouldn't view that as being "owned". I was thinking a high second/late first would be more than fair and almost wishful thinking. In fact, Philly might throw a parade if that happened.

People tend to overate the value players in "player for picks" trades. You have to take into consideration the length of the contract remaining and cost of that contract, direction and needs of the teams involved, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't look now, but a 3-game win streak, including 2 on the road in back-to-back games. The Canes haven't won 3 straight since the middle of November, over 2 months ago.  Canes held Dallas to 23 SOG, with a lot of those coming in a late game flurry. Canes have had some difficulty keeping SOG down to where we're used to seeing them. The Dallas game was reminiscent of the defense we saw early in the season- standing teams up at the blue line and making zone entry a real pain in the pads. 
    • Agreed with a lot of this. Couple thoughts, especially towards the OL/future cap things... First, I hope Bryce is good enough to command being paid a Top 5 QB salary. Great news for us if so. But as of now, I think he'd be in that mid-tier range, so that $60 gets cut to 30-40. Baker to Stafford range. Obviously the cap will go up and $60 might be the new mid-tier, but either way I think we're fine here. He either continues to ascend and gets paid Top 5 money because he's that good and thank God. Or, he shows he's Baker level, gets a competitive offer that's outside the Top 10, and we're "saving" money (but also paying someone who may not be the "guy" in that scenario).  The OL is the biggest thing going forward IMO. You're 100% right here about the need for an OL, paying them, % of the cap, etc. Which is why in the next couple of drafts, we HAVE to absolutely nail a couple OL picks. We can't realistically tie up that much money in our OL. So we better turn into the Cowboys the late 2010s and constantly have a revolving cycle of a couple highly paid pieces, with drafted guys who step up and take their place once we have to move on. One highly paid OT, one highly paid OG, and then find rookie deals or cheaper vets that fit well.  Point being, we're teetering on the edge of a few foundational pieces being here now. IF, and history isn't on our side here, we can nail the next couple of drafts...we're in a good spot when it comes to the cap and future. If we don't find a couple of defensive cornerstones and find reliable OL depth that can take over for Hunt/Moton/Lewis as they age or contracts balloon...that's when we're right back in hell IMO. No pressure, Dan. 
    • Online Cricket Betting Odds in India +91-7891623306  Online Casino India | In Punjab
×
×
  • Create New...