Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Memorable kills in BFBC II


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

to beat a sniper, one must become a sniper

I've done that. I don't mind playing sniper, but it's kind of boring to me. If I get really irritated with snipers on the other team, and my team isn't doing anything about them, I'll play sniper just to pick them off. Or I'll play sniper if we back them into their base and pick them off as they're coming out.

And southcak...that's a good idea, unless the other team has about 3 or 4 snipers in the same general area. It's next to impossible to get around them and knife them..unless they REALLY suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone else experiencing a bunch of lag/rubber banding (XBOX)?

i thought it was just me, but EA has a dedicated thread about it asking for info. Seems to be an East coast problem, more than anywhere else.

I experienced a good bit the first day I had the game. I'm on the West Coast. The only trouble I've had since then was "skating" down a stairwell once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lag is killing me. Especially when trying to take down a chopper or UAV you fire, and it scoots back and you're just sitting here screaming DAMN IT on the mic.

Secondly, the way I like to deal with snipers is either switching to sniper and mortar their general area (at least it'll buy you time from the dust that's thrown up) and then spamming the back button along the edges.

Another way I like to deal with them is to edge run the ENTIRE map and make sure you have C4. you'll eventually find some. Set all your C4s behind them and KAPOW. then proceed to do something stupid for the next couple of seconds because they'll see you on the kill cam.

One last way is to switch to smoke grenades and throw up smoke anywhere you go that's in the open. If you haven't unlocked them yet, make sure you don't run in a straight line or stand in one spot for too long. You CAN hear the bullets go by.

Personally I like Rush more than Conquest. The snipers are easy to spot in Rush since the map is more linear. Plus most objectives are INSIDE buildings so you're usually safe from them. Secondly, I find that I see more teamwork during Rush than Conquest, usually people on Conquest like to camp an area and not really go after any objectives. At least with Rush, when objectives are blown up, it forces people to move from their position. The only thing is that there's a lot of Assault Class whores. But they're easy to deal with once you get used to it.

Last but not least, play with some experienced players and stick to them. Learn the importance of spotting and providing ammo/health and repairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, lag got bad a few times Friday night/Saturday morning. I noticed some correlation between me spraying with a turret or bradley and the amount of complaining about the lag. Otherwise, I only noticed it when several vehicles were in use at the same time.

I think with EA running dedicated servers and my connection (usual results from speedtest.net = ping time under 20 ms, 20+ mbps down, 10+mbps up) I should never experience lag in this game. But I'm guessing everyone experiences the same lag at the same time. I wonder if the problem is EA's servers or one slow connection messing up the latency for everyone.

Thanks, southcakalac, for making me look like I knew what I was doing for a while there. I promise I'll return the favor when Ghost Recon Future Soldier is released. My GRAW2 clan used to win games to the tune of 50 - 2. And those two kills were usually bait to get the other team in position to be flanked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, lag got bad a few times Friday night/Saturday morning. I noticed some correlation between me spraying with a turret or bradley and the amount of complaining about the lag. Otherwise, I only noticed it when several vehicles were in use at the same time.

I think with EA running dedicated servers and my connection (usual results from speedtest.net = ping time under 20 ms, 20+ mbps down, 10+mbps up) I should never experience lag in this game. But I'm guessing everyone experiences the same lag at the same time. I wonder if the problem is EA's servers or one slow connection messing up the latency for everyone.

Thanks, southcakalac, for making me look like I knew what I was doing for a while there. I promise I'll return the favor when Ghost Recon Future Soldier is released. My GRAW2 clan used to win games to the tune of 50 - 2. And those two kills were usually bait to get the other team in position to be flanked.

No worries man. Hit me up when I'm online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whodatjorts and TheSaint. Add me on your friends list in yall are on xbox. Pepp90. i need more people to play with.

Although i own it for the 360, I am playing on the ps3(from gamefly). For whatever reason, I am much better at pwning on there.

I am actually going to trade in my 360 copy today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...