Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe Moore NOT starter (per Gantt, per sources)


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Well, if that ain't mixed signals! But, it's probably for the best. LINK

Two league sources said the Panthers have put out word they're looking for someone to compete with Matt Moore for the starting job. That's a slight departure from what they said Friday when they announced the release of Jake Delhomme, but given that Moore's started seven NFL games, it makes sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Competition is a good thing.

It will push Moore to performe at his best

Fan's forget Panthers are a RUN first team...

All Moore has to do is come in hand ,protect the ball ,and throw a more accurate pass than Delhomme did to STEVE>

Steve made alot of Jakes high sailers and Floaters look good .

Moore has already shown he can do all the above

Manning,Brady type QB's are not coming to Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to read here. Of course they want someone who can compete to start.

You have a young and relatively unproven guy. To pick up someone who was not starter quality would be a huge mistake.

Gannt is trying to find filler for his reporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

I tend to agree.

Unless a guy fell into our lap and was clearly the BPA, I am not keen on taking a QB early.

We have Moore....very young. Why would you want a young guy that you hopefully are making your starter...backed up by a rookie.

We end up like Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep talking about drafting a QB as a solution to our QB depth situation?

Right now, our QB stable has a cumulative total of 7 NFL games and some change. How will drafting another unproven rookie improve that situation? We need a veteran who, if need be, can start week 1.

I hear this guy named Jake Delhomme is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seneca wallace is now a brown, so maybe one of the qb's from the cleveland stable is going to be shipped out of town. i am a moore backer and want him to start. he still needs another wr to help make his and smitty's life easier, but a veteran backup would make me feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...