Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hoover released...

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

If I own a company and fire a manager, then some of the closest friends of that manager give me shit about it, I fire their asses too. Thats the sort of crap that will cause long term issues in the office and be a detriment to the development of younger employees.

Just sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Link Newbie

The Link

Posted
Posted

that doesnt make any sense. why would we draft the best fb in the draft and have a situational rb that looked decent for us start next year?

He performed better than Fiametta did. I'll reserve my judgement until after TC though. Since Hoover is no longer here he doesn't have a vet at the FB position to be blindly loyal to. Hopefully that means the best man will start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

Nope, Hoover was a sentimental favorite but if I had to choose one FB at this point in time, it makes more sense to choose Fiametta.

My only concern is loss of leadership from guys like Hoover, but sometimes you have to take your chances and hope new leaders will step up.

Still have Gross, Beason, Harris and Smitty. Smitty is going to feel old this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

He performed better than Fiametta did. I'll reserve my judgement until after TC though. Since Hoover is no longer here he doesn't have a vet at the FB position to be blindly loyal to. Hopefully that means the best man will start.

I understand where ure getting at....its not going to happen tho...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...