Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers fire Director of Analytics(or just AI created wishful thinking)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

As the Panthers navigate this transition, the impact of Rajack’s work will continue to resonate, underscoring the indelible link between data and the intricate dance of football strategy.

No sh*t, Sherlock.  His impact will be with us in both salary cap and limited draft picks.  What a legacy.  /s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

who’s been with the team since 2019, has played a pivotal role in game planning, trend analysis, and shaping the Panthers’ approach to player research. This decision comes as a surprise to many, especially considering Rajack’s significant contributions to the team’s strategies and player selection processes, most notably in the draft selection this year.

Ummm...and people think this is a shock that we fired him?

How the hell has he helped ANYTHING?

Seems obvious that he should be fired if he was pivotal in what we've done since 2019.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't measure DOG in analytics.  This isn't Moneyball.  

They throw analytics around like it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.  While it has its positives it shouldn't be the go-to reason for any decision in the NFL.  Those analytics are the reason the Lions are home watching the Super Bowl instead of playing in it. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The analytics of our analytics work over the years shows abject and utter failure in that department. I have never seen anyone put so much work into being wrong so many times over such a long period. 

It's as if he had bought an analysis program that had been compiled to give the exact opposite results that it should have.

The average fantasy football dweeb rookie would have hit on more success than he would have.

He should return some of Tepper's money.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tbe said:

This smells like Dan and the scouting dept saying “he made us draft those guys”.

This sounds like Dan and Dave seeing that what we had done resulted in poo.

Tepper, Fitt, and Rhule serm like analytics kind of people who would trust that poo over knowing the game and trusting instincts.

Analytics absolutely doesn't seem like something Dan would rely on to the degree that the panthers under fitt tried to and failed with.

Just because Dan was here doesn't mean that all decisions and methods of making decisions the team made he was in board with.

This is what happens when you see a need to change course and then work to correct it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Its funny that it lists all the reasons why he was fired as evidence of why he was supposedly great at his job.

I thought the same thing, this could have been a sarcastic article from the Onion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say whoever wrote that article was a tad overdramatic.

So you are telling me that the fact that Panthers fired some guy most of never thought about didn't "send ripples thru the league"?  lol

Unfortunately, this is what passes for news today.  Hyperbole and getting clicks is more important than objective and analytical reporting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

This came up on a feed for me today.  I have not verified it 

https://fanrecap.com/article-706116/?utm_source=carolina-panthers&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=nfl-mk&fbclid=IwAR0xqmLhpMQSKR5PHHfWlg626spsZ_UYQls9rz3wsaTNS9O_6OdD0-9c4tc_aem_AS6RCGSRdFxlpCbxxHN1pswEAf2liiLsL09zTx2q5yxzB7lQFkDi-7cUUPcAjC0L91Q

In an unexpected move that’s sent ripples through the league, the Carolina Panthers are bidding farewell to Taylor Rajack, their esteemed director of football analytics. Rajack, who’s been with the team since 2019, has played a pivotal role in game planning, trend analysis, and shaping the Panthers’ approach to player research. This decision comes as a surprise to many, especially considering Rajack’s significant contributions to the team’s strategies and player selection processes, most notably in the draft selection this year.

Taylor Rajack joined the Panthers’ ranks in 2019, bringing with him a fresh perspective on how data and analytics could influence football operations. Over the years, his expertise and insights into game preparation, trend analysis, and player research have become invaluable to the Panthers. Rajack’s knack for deciphering complex data and translating it into actionable strategies has made him a central figure in the team’s decision-making process.

Perhaps the most compelling evidence of Rajack’s analytical prowess was how his findings led to a favorable comparison of Young to NFL legend Drew Brees. Through meticulous data analysis, Rajack demonstrated that Young’s accuracy in key areas of the field mirrored that of Brees. This comparison not only bolstered confidence in selecting Young but also showcased the profound impact analytics can have in evaluating talent.

One aspect of Young’s game that sparked debate among scouts and analysts was his ability to throw effectively to the middle of the field. This is where Rajack’s expertise shone brightly. By leveraging advanced analytics, Rajack was able to alleviate concerns surrounding Young’s capability in this area. His analytical work included creating detailed heat maps and assembling statistics that highlighted Young’s precision in short-area throws and over-the-middle passes.

As the Carolina Panthers and Taylor Rajack part ways, it marks the end of a notable chapter for the team. Rajack’s innovative approach to football analytics has undoubtedly left its mark, highlighting the growing significance of data in shaping the strategies and decisions of NFL teams. His contributions, especially in the selection of Bryce Young, will be remembered as a testament to how analytics can illuminate the path to drafting future stars of the sport. As the Panthers navigate this transition, the impact of Rajack’s work will continue to resonate, underscoring the indelible link between data and the intricate dance of football strategy.

 

 

 

 

 

This reads like a parody and not a very good one. Why would this guy's firing send ripples through the NFL? Well, I guess you could say the Panthers might suck a little less at drafting but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...