Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler: Cutting Delhomme was a mistake


Dpantherman

Do you Agree w/ Scott Fowler  

86 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you Agree w/ Scott Fowler

    • yes
      10
    • no
      54
    • he needs pie
      22


Recommended Posts

People are just not used to this team making feasible business decisions, Fowler included. This team has shown its loyalty too much in the past, so much that it has hurt the organization.

Jake was no longer respected as a player on this team and among the fans. I love him as a person, and am grateful for what he has done. But his time his up. Fowler fowled up with this article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where Scott is coming from, cutting Jake makes perfect sense in this uncapped year. Teams need to operate under the assumption that the cap will return, so this might be the only window of opportunity the Panthers had to do this without long-term cap implications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ultimate, gold-plated insurance policy

Really? Really??? So silly. I stopped reading here.

I like Jake as a person and a player, but it was past time for him to go... as someone else said, the mistakes were his contract extension and Fox's stubbornness on not benching him last season... not this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that I think this is a bad move.

I did not want Jake to start. However, he is as good a back-up QB as we will sign. Plus, he knows this offense and is respected in teh locker room.

If Fox could have ensured that Jake would be the back-up, I would have voted to keep him.

Fox's inability to change is what forced JR to make this move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that I think this is a bad move.

I did not want Jake to start. However, he is as good a back-up QB as we will sign. Plus, he knows this offense and is respected in teh locker room.

If Fox could have ensured that Jake would be the back-up, I would have voted to keep him.

Fox's inability to change is what forced JR to make this move.

please stop. Jake Delhomme was getting paid Starting QB money to sit on the bench in 2010. its over. quit. done. In the real world when you can no longer do your job what happens??? you get Fired. end of story. finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please stop. Jake Delhomme was getting paid Starting QB money to sit on the bench in 2010. its over. quit. done. In the real world when you can no longer do your job what happens??? you get Fired. end of story. finished.

So now he is being paid starter money to not play....what is your point?

Pay him $12.7M as a back-up....or pay him $12.7M to not play.

The only way this makes financial sense is for future years. Dump his $12.7M now and no cap hit. Keep him and release him in a year or two and you would have $6-8M of cap hit in that year. That is the only way this makes sense.

Posts like yours is evidence that you could never run a company or organization. You let your emotions drive your decisions. When that happens, you usually fail.

Given the poor quality of any post you have ever made, you would be better served to lurk in the weeds and learn from your elders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the sentimental attachment that many on the team had for jake, it was going to be nearly impossible for moore to take the team over in the offseason. best thing for moore and the team was to eliminate jake altogether.

you want to move forward? cut ties with the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...