Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest PSL owners survey


Go To Girl

Recommended Posts

The seat thing is a meh, but if I were an upper level seat owner, the enclosed area thing might be worth a little cash.

The fast pass thing I would definitely be interested in, as tailgating always goes to the past possible minute, then we have to put stuff away and rush - it would be worth it to get 5-10 minutes of extra free time on gameday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got it yesterday as well....there are 12 questions ranking how important your preferences are on a 1 to 5 scale....adding $49.99 a year to your 'amenities' (i'm a Club Seat owner) to my yearly ticket charge for a seat cushion for every game......that was a joke and I told'em so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it says to enter for an autographed helmet on the email, then it changes to a football at the end. Then it asks for your account number in order to enter which I definately don't know off the top of my head, Hell I can't even find it on my Panther's PSL account web-page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way they worded the 500 level "club area" and how much would I be willing to pay way vague. I didn't put a monetary amount, but rather answered with the question..."as a separate fee or via increased ticket price?"

I have no idea as a separate cost, but as a increased ticket price, I'd say $10.00 per PSL seat. That's an additional $100.00 PER seat each season. I think that's reasonable. Anything else wouldn't be worth it for a closed-in area with additional vendors and a few TVs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way they worded the 500 level "club area" and how much would I be willing to pay way vague. I didn't put a monetary amount, but rather answered with the question..."as a separate fee or via increased ticket price?"

I have no idea as a separate cost, but as a increased ticket price, I'd say $10.00 per PSL seat. That's an additional $100.00 PER seat each season. I think that's reasonable. Anything else wouldn't be worth it for a closed-in area with additional vendors and a few TVs.

My impression from the question on my survey was the "club area" would be optional. I said "not at all interested" in anything like a club area. If I had to pay extra to have that without a choice I would be pissed.

I wouldnt use something like a club area, to each is own on that though. I have actually left a suite during a game to go back to my seats. I dont enjoy being at the game as much when I am not in the crowd, out in the elements, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My impression from the question on my survey was the "club area" would be optional. I said "not at all interested" in anything like a club area. If I had to pay extra to have that without a choice I would be pissed.

I wouldnt use something like a club area, to each is own on that though. I have actually left a suite during a game to go back to my seats. I dont enjoy being at the game as much when I am not in the crowd, out in the elements, etc.

I have two PSLs, (divorced, though dating) and I tend to take a guest with me to games. If I have a guest that doesn't want to be out in a cold and/or rainy game, then I would cetainly use the club level. Also, I sit on the sunny side of the stadium and have been blistered in some of the early September games, so I could see using the club then as well.

I think it would be best as a "general admission" type deal and not best done as a hike in PSL tickets. I just think as ab admission cost they will ask too much money to quickly try to recoup the building costs.

Again, as an annual fee, I have no idea what they will charge, but rest assured, it will not be reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two PSLs, (divorced, though dating) and I tend to take a guest with me to games. If I have a guest that doesn't want to be out in a cold and/or rainy game, then I would cetainly use the club level. Also, I sit on the sunny side of the stadium and have been blistered in some of the early September games, so I could see using the club then as well.

I think it would be best as a "general admission" type deal and not best done as a hike in PSL tickets. I just think as ab admission cost they will ask too much money to quickly try to recoup the building costs.

Again, as an annual fee, I have no idea what they will charge, but rest assured, it will not be reasonable.

I hear ya, that is why I say to each is own and why it definately needs to be optional.

Now when it comes to quests... for me if they dont want to be in the elements,etc then they dont go :P I also tell any friend/guest that I dont leave until the clock says 0:00 no matter what - if they have an issue with that, they dont go :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two PSLs, (divorced, though dating) and I tend to take a guest with me to games. If I have a guest that doesn't want to be out in a cold and/or rainy game, then I would cetainly use the club level. Also, I sit on the sunny side of the stadium and have been blistered in some of the early September games, so I could see using the club then as well.

I think it would be best as a "general admission" type deal and not best done as a hike in PSL tickets. I just think as ab admission cost they will ask too much money to quickly try to recoup the building costs.

Again, as an annual fee, I have no idea what they will charge, but rest assured, it will not be reasonable.

I would hope that the masses would not use it. That way it could be exlusive for us wine sipping, cigar smoking, elitists.....:D:sifone::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...