Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assistant Coach Chatter

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

I think it speaks volumes for how well Dave Canales was thought of in Tampa by seeing him be able to bring some of these solid veteran coaches with him. They must know that without Canales Todd Bowles will go back to being on the hot seat like he was before the start of last season. 

It is a decent amount of staff to let go (and have to replace) especially with them all concentrated on one side of the ball.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KBRed Community Regular

KBRed

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe it's just me, but I'm getting a sense from looking back at Canales and Idzik's respective backgrounds that their Panther offense might be more pass heavy than previous editions.

That's just a hunch, though.

On WFNZ, they had someone associated with Tampa…he said that he spoke to Mike Evans about Canales…and that Mike said that he has never run routes like that before. The one thing the guy said he could work on, and that Tampa fans would agree, is his run plays. Said often times they were up the middle, with not a lot of redirection. But, he knew he would get better, but the routes were phenomenal. 
 

So, I think you might be right there. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
0kBoomer Enthusiast

0kBoomer

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe it's just me, but I'm getting a sense from looking back at Canales and Idzik's respective backgrounds that their Panther offense might be more pass heavy than previous editions.

That's just a hunch, though.

It’s a passing league now so I would hope so

Link to comment
Share on other sites
0kBoomer Enthusiast

0kBoomer

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, csx said:

 

with Bryce Young you hope we run less than when compared to to Tampa that was at bottom third of league in rush attempts?

Sounds disastrous.

I hope we are a good team. Listening to Canales philosophy it sounds like they will do whatever puts them in the best position to win and they aren’t going to be dead set on anything. 
 

But the rules as they are right now benefit passing the football. So yes I hope we use those rules to our advantage and not run just for the sake of balance. 
 

but if that sounds disastrous to you then idk what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RJK Grand Master

RJK

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, csx said:

 

with Bryce Young you hope we run less than when compared to to Tampa that was at bottom third of league in rush attempts?

Sounds disastrous.

Tampas offense was middle of the road or worse in most statistical categories. I’m fine with the hire but i think expectations need to be tempered quite a bit for our new “offensive genius” HC 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panfan35 Enthusiast

Panfan35

Posted
Posted

That’s one thing Bryce got visibly upset during the Chicago game that the game plan was playing not to lose. So I got a feeling that Bryce was restrained from what makes him great! Now you change the scheme wr route that are more creative with formations that not predictable we have a totally new offense that will succeed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

It was only a couple of weeks ago that The Athletic mentioned a possible pairing in Carolina of Evero and Johnson, who have the same agent. But now there’s a sense in NFL circles that Evero is more interested in pursuing defensive coordinator positions elsewhere than returning to the Panthers.

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...