Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assistant Coach Chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I am not sure what moves the Panthers are going to make to improve the team but keeping Evero on as DC should be one of their plans 

I would like to see them keep Evero to help Canales focus on everything else he has to take on. Having EE to continue building and improving an already steady defense, is huge.

However, if EE doesn't want to be here and Canales/Morgan/Panthers brass are highly confident Evero will be hired next coaching cycle, I see the upside in cutting ties now. Rip the band-aid off from the previous regime and start fresh. 

Leslie Frazier and Marquand Manuel, Joe Cullen are all available to step in, with Frazier providing a more vet/experienced mind to support a younger HC.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

I'm not sure continuity on defense is a good thing. From my perspective Evero and his team should be released.  Better yet try to trade Evero for a pick. But keeping him on when he was passed over for the HC job is asking for trouble. He would not intentionally cause trouble but there will be a division among players for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure continuity on defense is a good thing. From my perspective Evero and his team should be released.  Better yet try to trade Evero for a pick. But keeping him on when he was passed over for the HC job is asking for trouble. He would not intentionally cause trouble but there will be a division among players for sure. 

Feels a lot different than the Wilks situation.  #1 he wasn't the interim HC.   #2 There aren't players out there campaigning for Evero as HC like there was for Wilks.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...