Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales Hire Temperature Gauge


Ricky Spanish
 Share

How do you feel about the Canales Hire?  

370 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the Canales Hire?

    • Love it!
      120
    • Hate it!
      28
    • Indifferent
      220


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

So he changed.  That's promising.  Maybe he will keep changing/adapting?

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The  "change" I want to see from Tepper is him butting his ass out 

Canales doesn't really strike me as having the leverage to do that unless Morgan backs him.

We'll have to see if that happens.

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Dan Morgan will stop Tepper from crossing the LOS. It’s his specialty. 

I genuinely hope so.

Mind you, Dan will still have to prove he knows what he's doing too.

What scares me is I remember him advocating for the Panthers to sign Michael Vick back in the day.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Glad we have a coach with  potential  at this point.

Let's get to work.

The Morgan hire is more the issue right now.

Why is Morgan the bigger issue? Experience? He and Canales worked together for years in Seattle. This hire was Morgan-led, so if your mindset is that Morgan is a puppet for Tepper ... so is Canales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Montsta said:

Reading through this thread looks exactly like it did when we hired Rhule due to his youth, and then again when we hired Reich due to his experience. This guy will also poo the bed and I imagine the thread when he gets fired (O/U is at 25 games and I’ll take the under) will also look just like the Rhule/Reich fired threads. 

Sadly it doesn't matter if we lose  every game this dude is likely our HC for the next 2 years at least.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Morgan got his guy. Perhaps we should all rejoice. 

We can at least fool ourselves into thinking that Morgan told Tepper--who we all know wanted Johnson--to effectively "put a sock in it."

yeah this is a good sign that Morgan is running the show. Not the biggest fan of keeping him considering how bad the team he's had a large hand in building has been but at least we likely finally have a HC hired by a GM so they are both on the same page and have the same vision of the team. The Hurney/Rhule/Fitterer/Reich situations were all so completely out of sync.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...