Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers closing in on hiring DAVE CANALES


Coheed
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Deepest HC pool and we could only come up with a guy who has been carried by some of the top 5 WR rooms in the NFL?!

 

His own Dam former team didn’t even want to consider him for their opening

He was the WR coach for Seattle for a while. He helped find/build some of those WR rooms. 

  • Pie 4
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Deepest HC pool and we could only come up with a guy who has been carried by some of the top 5 WR rooms in the NFL?!

 

His own Dam former team didn’t even want to consider him for their opening

It’s certainly odd makes me think Bryce and tepper are not well regarded 

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

That's definitely reason to be optimistic. Tbh the main thing separating Wilson on the Seahawks and Bryce Young was that Wilson could close his eyes and throw up a wobbler, and one of his WRs would actually break off his route and come back for the ball and come down with the catch. If BY did similar it would be ugly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

I think this hire is very telling of who is calling the shots. It's no secret that Tepper wanted Ben Johnson, but for him to listen to Morgan wanting Canales maybe means he is leaving it up Morgan. I would have thought that they would at least wait for a second interview with Ben Johnson before deciding. 

Ben said no already I would bet

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Panthers saw him orchestrate 9 points in the last game and were so blown away that they had to hire him. 
 

This is a knee jerk, impatient, and poor hire. I bet he is gone within two years. 

His offense also just orchestrated an average of 27.5ppg across two playoff games??

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless I can't imagine we draft two edge rushers. 
    • The players who will be available to us with those picks are irrelevant because it's still not a good trade.  And for at sam that has a recent history of making bad draft pick based trades, all this trade would do is make teams continue to low ball us in trade offers because it's clear we get pushed around. And it being that type of draft is also exactly why it's a terrible trade, because it's a bit of a crapshoot draft, so every pick you move down, makes you more likely to make a wrong pick than a right one.  Even over drafting a player is a smarter move, because it means we are still taking someone we REALLY believe in, which in a draft like this is more important than value, because it gives you a better chance of hitting on the pick. All of that is also before you even dig in further and see that this is proposing a trade with the Falcons. If we're allowing a divisional opponent to move up from 15 to 8 to take someone they clearly badly want, you need to make them bleed for it.  I made my comments before realizing it, and still stick by that trade package if it was a non NFCS team, now knowing it's the Falcons, if we're going from 8 to 15, I want next year's 1st and 2nd as well as this year's 2nd, anything less and they can go kick rocks.
    • If we aren’t sold on anyone at 8, this would be a good trade imo. We would get a really good player at 46. This is an unusual draft with a lot of really good players from 10-50. 
×
×
  • Create New...